TITLE

High court takes benefit case

PUB. DATE
October 1994
SOURCE
Business Insurance;10/3/94, Vol. 28 Issue 40, p2
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Reports on the United States Supreme Court's review of a 1993 decision by the 3rd US Circuit Court of Appeals on employee health benefits. Violation of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) by Curtiss-Wright Corp.; Issue of benefit plan language; Possible changes in pension plan administration.
ACCESSION #
9410211890

 

Related Articles

  • UK government plans billion pound pensions tax giveaway for the wealthy.  // MarketWatch: Financial Services;August 2005, Vol. 4 Issue 8, p17 

    The article focuses on Great Britain's pensions simplification regulation. The "A Day" pensions simplification regulation will create a pensions boom for the wealthiest consumers. The pensions simplification regulation will make it easier to make payments into pensions, invest funds within them,...

  • Milestones in U.S. benefits legislation from ERISA to the present.  // Business Insurance;12/27/99, Vol. 33 Issue 52, p10 

    Enumerates employee fringe benefits legislation approved in the United States from 1974 to 1998. Includes the 1974 Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA); 1980 Multiemployer Pension Plan Amendments Act; 1988 Family Support Act; 1998 Internal Revenue Service Restructuring & Reform Act.

  • Shrinking the cost of commuting. Wise, Debra // Cosmopolitan;Nov93, Vol. 215 Issue 5, p48 

    Focuses on transit voucher programs, a new employee benefit that allows the companies to offset their employees' commuting costs with coupons that are tax-deductible to the employer and tax-free for the recipient. Benefits for the companies.

  • Changes to preliminary notice take effect. Abdulaziz, Sam K. // Reeves Journal: Plumbing, Heating, Cooling;Jan2000, Vol. 80 Issue 1, p11 

    Focuses on the efforts of the California Legislature to change the Preliminary Notice Statute governing fringe benefits of employees. Changing of the term `employer payments' to include payments for labor as well as some fringe benefits; Provisions under the Preliminary Notice law; Failure of...

  • Benefit issues in the wake of the attacks. Censor, Martin A. // Westchester County Business Journal;10/8/2001, Vol. 40 Issue 41, p21 

    Focuses on employment-related issues affecting local businesses following the terrorist attacks in New York City. Provisions of the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA); Requirements for FMLA; Availability of assistance.

  • WHAT IS AN EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLAN?: ERISA PREEMPTION OF 'ANY WILLING PROVIDER' LAWS AFTER PEGRAM. Goodyear, Justin // Columbia Law Review;Jun2001, Vol. 101 Issue 5, p1107 

    Presents the implications of the United States Supreme Court decision for preemption of state laws under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA). Definition of benefit plan by ERISA; Relationship between the managed care organization and health care providers; Restrictions on the...

  • Study ERISA to prevent employee litigation. Sproule, Robert C. // Indianapolis Business Journal;6/12/95, Vol. 16 Issue 11, p39A 

    Focuses on the impact of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) for employers and employees alike. Prevention of employee litigation; Provisions under ERISA; Objectives of the act; Federal agencies' regulation of plans covered by the ERISA; Applicability of ERISA to retirement plans.

  • Well-earned breaks. Hagestadt, Charlotte // People Management;10/1/1998, Vol. 4 Issue 19, p22 

    Looks at how much leave eligible employees are entitled with under a regulation on compulsory annual leave in Great Britain. Highlights on the leave regulation; Rule on holiday pay for permanent office and factory workers; Information on Employment Rights Act of 1996; Rule on temporary staff...

  • Nurse's court challenge a motherhood issue. Mitchell, Penni // Herizons;Spring99, Vol. 13 Issue 1, p7 

    Reports Winnipeg, Manitoba nurse Kelly Lesiuk's filing of a lawsuit against the Canadian government over the Employment Insurance Act which the plaintiff claims to be unconstitutional. Minimum number of hours required for employees to receive benefits; Lesiuk's claim that the government failed...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics