Workers lose bid for contempt ruling vs. Kmart

Fearnley-Whittingstall, Sophy
July 1994
WWD: Women's Wear Daily;7/6/1994, Vol. 168 Issue 3, p15
Trade Publication
Reports on a county court judge's denial of a request by Kmart workers to issue a contempt ruling against Kmart Corp. in an invasion-of-privacy case filed by the workers. Kmart's hiring of Confidential Investigative Consultants Inc. for an employee spying campaign; Alteration of documents received by the plaintiffs.


Related Articles

  • Kmart to pay Calif. nearly $1m over Scanners.  // WWD: Women's Wear Daily;5/20/1994, Vol. 167 Issue 98, p2 

    Reports on the agreement of Kmart Corp. to pay $985,000 to the State of California to settle a complaint regarding the accuracy of its price scanners. Settlement procedure; Deduction of $3 off from any item that is scanned at a higher-than-listed price.

  • 20/20 casts eye on Kmart repair suit. Halverson, Richard // Discount Store News;11/7/94, Vol. 33 Issue 21, p1 

    Reports on the national class action suit filed against Kmart by customers who were allegedly defrauded on auto repairs. Case background; Plaintiffs' allegations; Kmart's arguments.

  • Kmart settles scanning dispute.  // Discount Store News;11/7/94, Vol. 33 Issue 21, p3 

    Reports on Kmart's settlement of the Michigan attorney general's complaint in connection with the company's scanners' overcharging of customers. Terms of the settlement; Complaint's allegations; Kmart's settlement of previous cases.

  • Labor dispute settled. Malcolm, Teresa // National Catholic Reporter;09/06/96, Vol. 32 Issue 38, p6 

    Reports on Kmart Corp.'s settlement of a labor struggle in Greensboro, North Carolina last July 1996. Agreement to sign a new labor contract; Campaign made by the Union of Needletrades, Industrial and Textile Workers since November 1993; Support of civic and business leaders in resolving the issue.

  • Teamsters: Kmart violated privacy.  // Discount Store News;10/4/93, Vol. 32 Issue 19, p2 

    Reports on the lawsuit filed by Teamsters Union against Kmart for alleged violation of its members' privacy. Employment of undercover detectives; Formation of personal relationships with employees; Denial of charge by Kmart.

  • Kmart's court approval.  // WWD: Women's Wear Daily;4/27/1994, Vol. 167 Issue 81, p10 

    Reports on a federal judge's dismissal of a trademark infringement lawsuit filed by Reebok International against Kmart Corp. and Melville Corp. Reebok's arguments against the logo on sneakers sold at Kmart; Judge's opinion on Reebok's claim.

  • Weighty snack food.  // Chain Store Age;Oct96, Vol. 72 Issue 10, p63 

    Reports on a lawsuit filed against Kmart by former employee Patricia Rue after she was fired for allegedly eating a pilfered bag of potato chips. Charges of defamation of character against Kmart for telling Rue's co-workers that she had stolen the snack food.

  • Business suit days.  // Chain Store Age;Mar1996, Vol. 72 Issue 3, p19 

    Focuses on the discrimination suits filed against Wal-Mart Stores and Kmart Corp. Claims made by the plaintiffs.

  • Court rejects sanctions against Kmart in employee spying case.  // Discount Store News;7/18/94, Vol. 33 Issue 14, p2 

    Reports on Cook County, Illinois court judge Dorothy Kinnaird's rejection of a petition for sanctions against Kmart for employee spying filed by the International Brotherhood of Teamsters. Opportunity to refile motion; Allegations against Kmart.


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics