In surprise, court reverses itself on Moldea ruling

Fields, Howard; Baker, John F.
May 1994
Publishers Weekly;5/9/1994, Vol. 241 Issue 19, p11
Trade Publication
Reports on the United States Court of Appeals' reversal of its decision that a trial be held on the merits of a suit by author Dan Moldea against the `New York Times' newspaper over a negative book review. Court's drawing of a distinction between opinion expressed in other parts of the newspaper and those expressed in a book review; Moldea's response to the reversal; Moldea's options.


Related Articles

  • Two negatives = court date(s).  // Quill;Oct94, Vol. 82 Issue 8, p31 

    Features the libel claim filed by author Dan Moldea against `The New York Times' newspaper. Moldea's claim that the periodical's book reviewer misportrayed his book; Reversal of decision before the Supreme Court petition; Implications of court decisions on journalists and publishers; Comments...

  • Moldea II: Are reviews protected? Kaufman, Henry L.; Cantwell, Michael // Publishers Weekly;10/24/1994, Vol. 241 Issue 43, p39 

    Opinion. Discusses the District of Columbia Court of Appeals' reversal of its previous decision concerning author Dan Moldea's libel suit against `The New York Times' newspaper. Details of the litigation; Implications of the court's new decision on publishers and authors; Dissenters.

  • N.Y. Times seeks review of libel suit reinstatement. Hernandez, Debra Gersh // Editor & Publisher;4/23/94, Vol. 127 Issue 17, p112 

    Reports on the petition filed by the New York Times before the United States Court of Appeals to review decision allowing the trial of a $10 million libel suit brought against the paper by author Dan Moldea. Moldea's case against the newspaper regarding the review of his book `Interference: How...

  • New York Times prevails in libel case. Hernandez, Debra Gersh // Editor & Publisher;10/15/94, Vol. 127 Issue 42, p20 

    Reports on the victory of `The New York Times' newspaper in a libel suit filed against it by author Dan Moldea. US Supreme Court's refusal to hear Moldea's appeal seeking to overturn a lower court's dismissal of the case; Moldea's libel charges against the newspaper in connection with its...

  • Who are they to criticize? They're critics, that's who. Dalglish, Lucy // Quill;May94, Vol. 82 Issue 4, p14 

    Discusses an appellate court's reinstatement of the libel lawsuit filed by book author Dan Moldea against `The New York Times' newspaper for publishing a critical book review in 1989. Implications of the ruling on the practice of journalism; Threat to role played by critics; Damage verdicts of...

  • Top court declines to review Moldea.  // Publishers Weekly;10/24/1994, Vol. 241 Issue 43, p10 

    Reports that the Supreme Court declined to review the Court of Appeals' ruling on the libel lawsuit filed by author Dan E. Moldea. Significance of the decision to publishers and journalists; Details of the lawsuit.

  • Moldea petitions Supreme Court.  // Editor & Publisher;8/27/94, Vol. 127 Issue 35, p27 

    Reports that author Dan Moldea has asked the US Supreme Court to reinstate his libel lawsuit against the `New York Times' newspaper. Appeals court's summary judgment in favor of the `Times.'

  • Book review not subject to libel. St. Lifer, Evan; Rogers, Michael // Library Journal;6/1/1994, Vol. 119 Issue 10, p18 

    Recounts how a federal appeals court reversed itself on May 3, 1994 in the suit of author Dan Moldea against the `New York Times' over a negative review of his book. Background of the suit; The question of First Amendment rights.

  • Times settles libel suit.  // Editor & Publisher;11/15/97, Vol. 130 Issue 46, p33 

    Reports on `The New York Times' newspaper's settlement of a libel suit filed by former Philadelphia, Pennsylvania prosecutor Barbara Christie over a report that she hid evidence and kept blacks off juries.


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics