Kmart's court approval

April 1994
WWD: Women's Wear Daily;4/27/1994, Vol. 167 Issue 81, p10
Trade Publication
Reports on a federal judge's dismissal of a trademark infringement lawsuit filed by Reebok International against Kmart Corp. and Melville Corp. Reebok's arguments against the logo on sneakers sold at Kmart; Judge's opinion on Reebok's claim.


Related Articles

  • Reebok settles price-fix case. Blake, Kevin // Consumers' Research Magazine;Aug95, Vol. 78 Issue 8, p38 

    Reports on the settlement of Reebok's nationwide lawsuit charging the company of conspiring to price fixings of their products. Reason cited for settlement.

  • Reebok settles suit, pays $9.5M penalty.  // Discount Store News;5/15/95, Vol. 34 Issue 10, p2 

    Reports on Reebok International Ltd.'s payment of penalty charges in settlement of the charges filed by the US Federal Trade Commission for pressuring retailers not to advertise its apparel or discount the price of its shoes by more than ten percent. Amount of penalty charges paid; Reasons why...

  • Court orders Reebok to donate to charities in price-fixing ruling. Vacco, Dennis C. // Hudson Valley Business Journal;12/11/95, Vol. 6 Issue 42, p21 

    Reports on a court ruling that directs Reebok to donate to charities as its sanction for violation of fair competition laws. Case background; Provisions of the court ruling.

  • Kmart to pay Calif. nearly $1m over Scanners.  // WWD: Women's Wear Daily;5/20/1994, Vol. 167 Issue 98, p2 

    Reports on the agreement of Kmart Corp. to pay $985,000 to the State of California to settle a complaint regarding the accuracy of its price scanners. Settlement procedure; Deduction of $3 off from any item that is scanned at a higher-than-listed price.

  • Workers lose bid for contempt ruling vs. Kmart. Fearnley-Whittingstall, Sophy // WWD: Women's Wear Daily;7/6/1994, Vol. 168 Issue 3, p15 

    Reports on a county court judge's denial of a request by Kmart workers to issue a contempt ruling against Kmart Corp. in an invasion-of-privacy case filed by the workers. Kmart's hiring of Confidential Investigative Consultants Inc. for an employee spying campaign; Alteration of documents...

  • 20/20 casts eye on Kmart repair suit. Halverson, Richard // Discount Store News;11/7/94, Vol. 33 Issue 21, p1 

    Reports on the national class action suit filed against Kmart by customers who were allegedly defrauded on auto repairs. Case background; Plaintiffs' allegations; Kmart's arguments.

  • Kmart settles scanning dispute.  // Discount Store News;11/7/94, Vol. 33 Issue 21, p3 

    Reports on Kmart's settlement of the Michigan attorney general's complaint in connection with the company's scanners' overcharging of customers. Terms of the settlement; Complaint's allegations; Kmart's settlement of previous cases.

  • Labor dispute settled. Malcolm, Teresa // National Catholic Reporter;09/06/96, Vol. 32 Issue 38, p6 

    Reports on Kmart Corp.'s settlement of a labor struggle in Greensboro, North Carolina last July 1996. Agreement to sign a new labor contract; Campaign made by the Union of Needletrades, Industrial and Textile Workers since November 1993; Support of civic and business leaders in resolving the issue.

  • Untitled. Van Housen, Caty // San Diego Business Journal;9/6/93, Vol. 14 Issue 36, p13 

    Reports on the lawsuit filed by Tiger Shark Golf against Reebok International for trademark infringement and unfair competition. Reason for the lawsuit; Tiger Shark's claims against Reebok; Agreement between Reebok and Great White Shark Enterprises.


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics