TITLE

Second chance

AUTHOR(S)
Fenyvesi, Charles
PUB. DATE
May 1994
SOURCE
U.S. News & World Report;5/23/94, Vol. 116 Issue 20, p24
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Reports that the Pentagon, tired of listening to the Army, Navy, Air Force and Marine Corps whine to Congress that they don't have the resources to carry out the nation's military strategy of being able to fight two wars simultaneously, has decided to give the four services another in-house budget hearing. Deputy Defense Secretary John Deutch's warning that taking their beefs to the Hill won't bring more funding for the services; His reopening of the internal review process.
ACCESSION #
9405177601

 

Related Articles

  • Defense reductions and U.S. manufacturing. Meckstroth, Daniel J. // Business Economics;Jan1992, Vol. 27 Issue 1, p49 

    Examines the expected reduction in manufacturing output and jobs as a result of reductions in defense spending in the United States. Defense budget reductions for fiscal year 1992-1996; Procurement reductions and future outlays; Personnel reductions; Estimates of employment impact.

  • Building defense on today's realities. Carter III, Hodding // Indianapolis Business Journal;10/10/94, Vol. 15 Issue 28, p12C 

    Asserts that there is no need for the United States to support a military force that is supposed to be capable of winning two major regional wars simultaneously. United Nations' condemnation and multinational response in the event of overt aggression; Ability of the nations being attacked to...

  • Let loose the costs of war. Doherty, Brian // Reason;Aug/Sep96, Vol. 28 Issue 4, p14 

    Focuses on the federal spending for the military's foreign operations. Understatement of cost estimates for military foreign operations; Increase in spending on contingency operations.

  • Inventing the threat: Clinton's defense budget. Borosage, Robert L. // World Policy Journal;Winter93/94, Vol. 10 Issue 4, p7 

    Discusses the defense budget, plans and programs of the President Bill Clinton Administration. Military spending; Investment deficit; `New dangers' that the military must address; Pentagon as identifying the real world powers; Two-war strategy as a distraction from the border strategic...

  • Legislation.  // Reporter;Dec90, Vol. 17 Issue 4, p22 

    Presents information on certain legislation in the United States Congress, which it completed for fiscal year 1991 authorization and appropriations for the military. Direction given to Department of Defense to phase out active duty military personnel in certain military agencies; Changes and...

  • Why the huge defense budget? No answer here. Cobban, Helena // Christian Science Monitor;4/11/96, Vol. 88 Issue 95, p19 

    Opinion. Questions why the defense budget in the United States is so high. Military spending during peacetime; Ignorance surrounding high military budget.

  • Avoid a `hollow' military. Cunningham, Randy // Christian Science Monitor;5/21/96, Vol. 88 Issue 123, p20 

    Opinion. Focuses on US Congress' effort to reverse President Bill Clinton Administration's defense budget cuts. Implications of the budget cuts on the country's national security; Excerpt from Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff John Shalikashvili's memo to Defense Secretary William Perry;...

  • National security at what price? The economic consequences of military spending. Lapidus, Kevin // American Economist;Fall93, Vol. 37 Issue 2, p68 

    Evaluates the methodologies and conclusions of Murray Weidenbaum and Seymour Melman in determining the economic effects of defense spending in the 1980s. Minimal significance of defense spending; Associated costs; Three resources which influence economic development; Redirection of national...

  • House GOP leaders want to level off defense spending. Goodrich, Lawrence J.; Nordahl, Peter E. // Christian Science Monitor;3/22/95, Vol. 87 Issue 80, p2 

    Announces the plan of Republicans to set a fixed limit to defense spending to be retained till the end of the century. Pentagon in the fray as well.

  • Effective demand, `Marxo-marginalism' and the economics of military spending: A rejoinder. Pivetti, Massimo // Cambridge Journal of Economics;Oct94, Vol. 18 Issue 5, p523 

    Examines the economic aspects of military spending in the United States. Unemployment rates; Trends in gross domestic product; Existence of a trade-off between the share of military expenditure and growth.

Share

Read the Article

Other Topics