TITLE

Reviewers win a reversal

AUTHOR(S)
Gest, Ted
PUB. DATE
May 1994
SOURCE
U.S. News & World Report;5/16/94, Vol. 116 Issue 19, p17
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Discusses how the US Court of Appeals in Washington, D.C. made a rare reversal in a prominent libel case. Issue which started in 1989 when a book review by `New York Times' sportswriter Gerald Eskenazi declared the Dan Moldea's `Interference: How Organized Crime Influences Professional Football' was flawed by `too much sloppy journalism'; Roger Simmons, Moldea's attorney, who convinced court the his client should be able to win damages; Ruling; Withdrawal of the decision.
ACCESSION #
9405107509

 

Related Articles

  • N.Y. Times seeks review of libel suit reinstatement. Hernandez, Debra Gersh // Editor & Publisher;4/23/94, Vol. 127 Issue 17, p112 

    Reports on the petition filed by the New York Times before the United States Court of Appeals to review decision allowing the trial of a $10 million libel suit brought against the paper by author Dan Moldea. Moldea's case against the newspaper regarding the review of his book `Interference: How...

  • Bad review = lawsuit. Fialkoff, Francine // Library Journal;5/15/1994, Vol. 119 Issue 9, p61 

    Asserts that a recent court ruling won't imperil `Library Journal' magazine's negative reviews. Implications of the ruling in Dan Moldea's suit against the `New York Times' for its review of his book `Interference: How Organized Crime Influences Professional Football'; Effect of the court's...

  • New York Times prevails in libel case. Hernandez, Debra Gersh // Editor & Publisher;10/15/94, Vol. 127 Issue 42, p20 

    Reports on the victory of `The New York Times' newspaper in a libel suit filed against it by author Dan Moldea. US Supreme Court's refusal to hear Moldea's appeal seeking to overturn a lower court's dismissal of the case; Moldea's libel charges against the newspaper in connection with its...

  • Top court declines to review Moldea.  // Publishers Weekly;10/24/1994, Vol. 241 Issue 43, p10 

    Reports that the Supreme Court declined to review the Court of Appeals' ruling on the libel lawsuit filed by author Dan E. Moldea. Significance of the decision to publishers and journalists; Details of the lawsuit.

  • Moldea II: Are reviews protected? Kaufman, Henry L.; Cantwell, Michael // Publishers Weekly;10/24/1994, Vol. 241 Issue 43, p39 

    Opinion. Discusses the District of Columbia Court of Appeals' reversal of its previous decision concerning author Dan Moldea's libel suit against `The New York Times' newspaper. Details of the litigation; Implications of the court's new decision on publishers and authors; Dissenters.

  • THE UNRULY WORLD OF BOOK REVIEWS. Weinberg, Steve // Columbia Journalism Review;Mar/Apr1990, Vol. 28 Issue 6, p51 

    The article discusses the controversy over the book reviews done by the "New York Times" particularly of the book entitled "Interference: How Organized Crime Influences Professional Football." Dan E. Moldea who has researched and written the book has filed a suit against the reviewer Gerald...

  • $10 million lawsuit against N.Y. Times revived on appeal. Hernandez, Debra Gersh // Editor & Publisher;3/19/94, Vol. 127 Issue 12, p28 

    Reports on the revival of a $10 million lawsuit filed by author Dan Moldea against the `New York Times' newspaper in relation to Moldea's book `Interference: How Organized Crime Influences Professional Football.' Appeal sought by Moldea after the case was dismissed in January 1922; Concerns...

  • Ruling reversed.  // Quill;Jun94, Vol. 82 Issue 5, p18 

    Reports on the collapse of a libel lawsuit filed against `The New York Times' newspaper for publishing a review of the book `Interference: How Organized Crime Influences Professional Football,' by Dan E. Moldea. Facts and issues of the case.

  • Libel law. Goldberg, Stephanie B. // ABA Journal;Jul94, Vol. 80 Issue 7, p74 

    Focuses on the federal Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia's reversal of a decision that found a book review by the periodical `New York Times' as libelous. Reviewer's criticism of Dan Moldea's `Interference: How Organized Crime Influences Professional Football'; Reasons for the reversal.

Share

Read the Article

Other Topics