Smoke, flame and fire

Grant, Linda
April 1994
U.S. News & World Report;4/18/94, Vol. 116 Issue 15, p46
Discusses how Philip Morris Cos. has filed a $10 billion lawsuit against ABC Broadcasting, charging that ABC repeatedly accused the company of lacing cigarettes with extra nicotine to make them more addictive. How the action has escalated the bitter confrontation between tobacco companies and their critics; How company maintains that cigarette use is an individual choice and that nicotine is not addictive; Legal action led by Steven Parrish; Tobacco sales abroad.


Related Articles

  • Philip Morris' $10B warning. Teinowitz, Ira; Fisher, Christy // Advertising Age;3/28/1994, Vol. 65 Issue 13, p2 

    Focuses on Philip Morris Company's libel suit against ABC that aims to warn media about treating lightly the unchecked charges of tobacco opponents. Possibility of Philip Morris' boycott of advertisements for ABC; US Department of Labor's proposal to ban smoking in most restaurants and offices;...

  • Deep cough, pt. 2.  // Quill;Mar95, Vol. 83 Issue 2, p5 

    Reports that a judge has ordered ABC News to reveal the identity of `Deep Cough' as part of Philip Morris Co.'s libel lawsuit. Allegation of confidential sources regarding Philip Morris and other cigarette manufacturers.

  • Tobacco libel suit against ABC brings new rulings.  // Christian Science Monitor;1/5/95, Vol. 87 Issue 28, p12 

    Reports on the rejection of the pleas of Philip Morris Company against the ABC by Judge T. J. Markow in his rulings on the case on December 30, 1994. Details of the case and the ruling.

  • Antitobacco activists bemoan the return of sealed company records subpoenaed in libel case. Scherer, Ron // Christian Science Monitor;8/24/95, Vol. 87 Issue 189, p13 

    Focuses on the out of court settlement of a law suit between Philip Morris and ABC and the documents that would have proved tobacco company's manipulation of the levels of nicotine in cigarettes. Virginia State Circuit Court Judge Theodore Markow's order to return the sealed documents to Philip...

  • Tobacco ABS: Massive court judgment barely an issue. M.G. // Asset Securitization Report;10/14/2002, Vol. 2 Issue 40, p5 

    Downplays concerns that the massive damages ruling against Philip Morris Inc. could affect securitizations in the United States backed by the Master Settlement Agreement. Reactions to the $28-billion award given to plaintiff Betty Bullock; Appeal against the award; Tort law; Assumption in...

  • U.S. Begins Its $279B Case Against the Tobacco Industry. Vadum, Matthew // Bond Buyer;9/22/2004, Vol. 349 Issue 31974, p1 

    Reports on the start of the trial of "U.S. v. Philip Morris USA Inc. et al," wherein the U.S. government alleges that the tobacco industry withheld evidence about the dangers of smoking. Tobacco companies named defendants in the case; Significance of the trial to the municipal bond market;...

  • This case smells.  // Hollywood Reporter;5/4/95, Vol. 337 Issue 6, p3 

    Reports on Philip Morris Cos. Inc.'s turnover of 25 boxes of papers to ABC in the former's libel lawsuit against the network. Appearance and chemical odor of papers; Sanction against Philip Morris for the condition of the documents.

  • Not playing fair.  // Quill;Jul/Aug95, Vol. 83 Issue 6, p3 

    Reports on American Broadcasting Co.'s (ABC) request to sanction Philip Morris for the condition of the documents the cigarette maker turned over in its libel lawsuit against the network.

  • ABC needn't cough up source.  // Hollywood Reporter;7/13/95, Vol. 338 Issue 3, p7 

    Reports on a Virginia court judge's withdrawal of orders for American Broadcasting Company (ABC) to reveal its `Deep Cough' source to Philip Morris which sued for libel over a stories alleging the tobacco companies' spiking cigarettes with addictive nicotine. Conditions for obtaining the source.


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics