Motorola rattles cellular data sabre

Krause, Reinhardt
December 1993
Electronic News;12/6/93, Vol. 39 Issue 1992, p22
Trade Publication
Reports on Motorola's claim on key patents for Cellular Digital Packet Data (CDPD) network equipment technology. Reactions to possible royalty demands; History of Motorola patent claims; Similar strategy pursued by Spectrum Information; Applications of CDPD by leading cellular carriers and modem makers; Corporate interest.


Related Articles

  • Court grants motions in patent dispute.  // RCR;09/06/99, Vol. 18 Issue 36, p25 

    Reveals that the United States District Court in San Diego, California, granted Qualcomm Inc.'s motions for summary judgment in its long-standing litigation with Motorola Inc. Patent-infringement claims associated with Motorola's StarTac handset; Breach of contract claims against Qualcomm.

  • Motorola countersues Qualcomm. Luna, Lynnette // RCR;08/23/99, Vol. 18 Issue 34, p10 

    Reports on Motorola Inc.'s filing of a breach of contract lawsuit against Qualcomm Inc. Background of the case; Claims of Qualcomm's non-compliance with a 1990 agreement with Motorola; Debate over cellular handset patents.

  • WST files lawsuit against Motorola.  // RCR;02/28/2000, Vol. 19 Issue 9, p65 

    Reports the patent infringement lawsuit filed against Motorola Inc. by Wireless Spectrum Technology Inc. in Northbrook, Illinois.

  • New lawsuit filed on Motorola patents.  // RCR;06/09/97, Vol. 16 Issue 23, p1 

    Reports that Motorola Incorporated has filed an additional patent infringement suit against Qualcomm Incorporated. Allegations of the lawsuit; Reference to a previous suit Motorola filed against Qualcomm; Circumstances surrounding that lawsuit; Denial of Motorola's request for an injunction...

  • Posner Speaks (Again) on Patent Reform: A Critique. Hudik, Kathleen // Intellectual Property Brief;2013, Vol. 14 Issue 1, p52 

    A letter to the editor is presented in response to the article "Why There Are Too Many Patents In America," by Judge Richard Posner in the July 18, 2013 issue.

  • Motorola and Qualcomm swap lawsuits. Shankar, Bhawani // Telecommunications - Americas Edition;Jun97, Vol. 31 Issue 6, p16 

    Reports that Motorola's plan to file a patent infringement suit charging that Qualcomm copied its CDMA digital phone. Comments by Wolf Pavlok, Motorola's senior vice president and general manager of the Pan American Cellular Subscriber Group; Qualcomm's countersuit against Motorola.

  • Posner's Position. Seidenberg, Steven // InsideCounsel;Sep2012, p22 

    The article examines the June 22, 2012 ruling made by Judge Richard Posner in the patent infringement case filed by Apple Inc. against Motorola Inc., and how it may alter the nature of patent litigation in the U.S. Posner ruled that both parties failed to provide adequate evidence of their...

  • Patent enforcement as a violation of antitrust law: EU Commission decisions in Samsung and Motorola***. Müller, Tilman; Henke, Volkmar // Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice;Nov2014, Vol. 9 Issue 11, p939 

    The article discusses patent enforcement as a violation of antitrust law in the European Union (EU) Commission decisions in Samsung and Motorola. The decisions are important to the future enforcement of standard essential patents (SEP) in Europe. Motorola had abused its dominant market position...

  • Further steps towards a uniform approach to RAND rates for standard-essential patents in the USA: the alternative ‘top down’ approach. Barazza, Stefano // Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice;Jan2014, Vol. 9 Issue 1, p6 

    A few months after Judge Robart, in Microsoft v Motorola, provided the first judicial determination of (fair,) reasonable and non-discriminatory (RAND) rates for standard-essential patents in the USA, a new case confirmed the validity of the approach based on an ex ante hypothetical bilateral...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics