Wheat growers give Clinton poor grades

October 1993
Agri Marketing;Oct93, Vol. 31 Issue 9, p17
Trade Publication
Reports on wheat growers' rating of President Bill Clinton's management of agricultural issues. Grade of D or F on domestic or international issues; Opposition to the North American Free Trade Agreement; Right to disaster payments on their 1992 crop; Better yields expected.


Related Articles

  • A shot in the arm for agriculture. Thompson, Jato // African Business;June97, Issue 222, p36 

    Focuses on the agricultural policies of the Nigerian government. Wave of enthusiasm for the government's agricultural and rural development programs; Family Economic Advancement Programme; Establishment of cottage industries at ward level in each local government area.

  • Righting the land wrong. Meldrum, Andrew // Africa Report;Jul/Aug92, Vol. 37 Issue 4, p17 

    Reports that up against fierce opposition from commercial farmers, Zimbabwe's Parliament has enacted a law to right the inequities of the colonial system, empowering the government to buy half the white-owned land for redistribution in 12-acre allotments to black farmers. White farmers have...

  • A pig in a GRIP. Webber, Larry // Alberta Report / Newsmagazine;3/15/93, Vol. 20 Issue 13, p19 

    Examines the Gross Revenue Insurance Plan (GRIP) which was originally implemented to shelter the grain industry from traditional nemises, bad weather and adverse export markets. The program's $400 million deficit in Alberta; Additional costs to taxpayers; Lack of guidelines for program...

  • Breakthrough on the crow. Carter, Toni Owen // Alberta Report / Newsmagazine;4/12/93, Vol. 20 Issue 17, p22 

    Discusses the announcement of Canadian federal agriculture minister Charlie Mayer that he would pay out the Crow benefit. Western Grain Transportation Act (WGTA); Mayer's disappointing timing; Background on the issue which dates back to the 1890s; Quebec farmers' views; Comments from Alberta...

  • Maz's hard line on crow reform. T.J. // Alberta Report / Newsmagazine;5/10/93, Vol. 20 Issue 21, p25 

    Announces federal Finance Minister Don Mazankowski said last week the cut of $720 million Crow benefit from the freight rate subsidy would be permanent and he warned prairie farmers that further cuts would follow if they didn't agree on a government plan to revise how the benefit is paid. Use...

  • Whittling away at the wheat board. Johnson, Terry // Alberta Report / Newsmagazine;5/17/93, Vol. 20 Issue 22, p20 

    Questions if the conclusion of Grande Prairie-born agricultural economist Colin Carter (University of California-Davis) that barley revenues in western Canada would jump by 17 percent if Prairie farmers and grain companies were allowed to bypass the Canadian Wheat Board is correct. Reaction of...

  • Alberta agriculture's painless snip, snip, snip. Johnson, Terry // Alberta Report / Newsmagazine;1/17/94, Vol. 21 Issue 5, p19 

    Says that while farmers who attended a series of meetings on cuts proposed by Alberta Agriculture understood the need to balance the budget, they also realize that Alberta Agriculture is in a better position to make painless cuts than other government departments. Support programs being...

  • Here come the deregulators. Johnson, Terry // Alberta Report / Newsmagazine;5/16/94, Vol. 21 Issue 22, p24 

    Cites a survey by the Dunvegan Group commissioned by `Financial Post' which found less than half the farmers polled in the three prairie provinces were satisfied with the performance of the Canadian Wheat Board and 63% wanted the right to sell their wheat on their own. Broad rejection of the...

  • Which future for farming?  // Commonweal;10/24/86, Vol. 113 Issue 18, p547 

    Editorial. Looks at two important questions: what kind of farmers and farm culture are we willing to support in the US, and how can US trade policies cultivate continued agricultural self-sufficiency for nations abroad. How to redirect government policies; Save the Farm Family Act; Export...

  • Farm futures. Terry, D. // Mother Jones;Oct89, Vol. 14 Issue 8, p6 

    Compares current national farm policy with farm policy since the 1920s. Strength of programs under the Roosevelt Administrations; Flaws in the current system, begun in the 1950s; Call for broad land reform to prevent an ecological and environmental crisis.


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics