Public Employee Speech and the Privatization of the First Amendment

November 2013
Connecticut Law Review;Nov2013, Vol. 46 Issue 1, p1
Constitutional protection of public employee speech has been declining for the past forty years, yet the reason for the decline has remained elusive. This Article puts forward a novel theory situating public employee speech in larger structural transformations in governmental organization. It identifies a "public/private convergence," the main feature of which is that public officials are increasingly viewed as private employees, resulting in a significant erosion of their free speech rights. This erosion is exacerbated by rising levels of privatization and civil service reforms exhibiting the same mode of thought: that public employees are no different from private employees. These trends have far reaching First Amendment implications that up until now have remained largely unexplored. Against this background, this Article argues that the privatization of public employee speech doctrine should be reconsidered for three main reasons. First, it overlooks the ways in which the public sector does not operate like the market. Second, it risks eroding the unique norms and culture the civil service aims to foster. Finally, it undermines a system of internal checks on state power that are especially important given the reduction in external monitoring capacity. Accordingly, the Article proposes two directions for reform: a doctrinal framework that resolves the problems with the Court's current position, and a new governance framework that relies on internal regulatory channels to encourage public employee voice.


Related Articles

  • Government Speech. Curran Jr, J. Joseph // Supreme Court Debates;Feb2009, Vol. 12 Issue 2, p7 

    An excerpt from a report by Maryland Attorney General J. Joseph Curran Jr. on October 2, 2001 regarding the provision of the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution prohibiting Congress of making law abridging the freedom of speech is presented.

  • GOVERNMENT SPEECH.  // Supreme Court Debates;May2015, Vol. 18 Issue 5, p6 

    An excerpt from the report "Freedom of Speech and Press: Exceptions to the First Amendment" is presented.

  • First Amendment/free speech is in the crosshairs. Kolodziej, Elaine // Wilson County News;4/9/2014, p10A 

    The author reflects on the First Amendment to the Constitution of the U.S. which protects the freedom of speech of all Americans in the country.

  • First Amendment provides the muscle.  // Washington Jewish Week;11/19/2015, Vol. 51 Issue 47, p18 

    The author reflects on the U.S. First Amendment and its protection of free-speech rights which is applicable to journalists and demonstrators.

  • Gay Talk: Protecting Free Speech for Public School Teachers. ELKIND, STEPHEN; KAUFFMAN, PETER // Journal of Law & Education;Spring2014, Vol. 43 Issue 2, p147 

    The article discusses freedom of speech protections in America in relation to public school teachers who talk about subjects such as homosexuality and gay and lesbian people as of 2014. According to the article, the U.S. Supreme Court diminished the free speech rights of teachers in the case...

  • IMAGINARY THREATS TO GOVERNMENT'S EXPRESSIVE INTERESTS. Norton, Helen // Case Western Reserve Law Review;Summer2011, Vol. 61 Issue 4, p1265 

    The article discusses the exemption of the government's own speech from the free speech clause scrutiny of the U.S. Supreme Court. It highlights the importance of government expression which enables members of the public to identify the priorities of the government. It emphasizes the court case...

  • A Communist and a Court's Decision: The Social Construction of Flag Worship Argumentation and Chief Justice Rehnquist's Dissent in Texas v. Johnson.  // Free Speech Yearbook;1998, Vol. 36, p15 

    An essay is presented on arguments over the meaning of flag desecration on a rhetorically-based study. It mentions that American flag symbolizes the U.S. and majority of the Americans believed that the flag must be honored and respected. The author asserts that flag desecration is a part of an...

  • THE PORNOGRAPHIC SECONDARY EFFECTS DOCTRINE. Fee, John // Alabama Law Review;2009, Vol. 60 Issue 2, p291 

    The secondary effects doctrine has made a muddle of First Amendment law. The doctrine formally holds that a speech regulation will be treated as content-neutral if its purpose is to control the secondary effects of speech, even if it facially discriminates according to speech content. It...

  • Speech is not so free in America. MOLLETTE, GLENN // Ellis County Press;5/22/2014, Vol. 23 Issue 7, p3 

    The author reflects on the practice of free speech in the U.S., which is said to be the First Amendment right for all Americans.


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics