TITLE

GCs and AGs join hands to tackle patent litigation

AUTHOR(S)
Harrison, Erin E.
PUB. DATE
January 2014
SOURCE
InsideCounsel;Jan2014, Vol. 24 Issue 265, p18
SOURCE TYPE
Trade Publication
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article reports on the collaboration of the general counsels (GCs) and attorney generals (AGs) in the U.S. to diminish the power of non-practicing entities (NPEs) commonly referred to as patent trolls. The use of state consumer laws by AGs to combat trolling in response to the rise of frivolous lawsuits is outlined. Information about the Innovation Act led by House Judiciary Chairman Bob Goodlatte that requires patent holders to disclose information upfront is also provided.
ACCESSION #
93428869

 

Related Articles

  • Thwarting 'patent trolls': Not as easy as it sounds. Rosen, Michael M. // AEI Paper & Studies;2014, p1 

    The article focuses on the need for patent reform that will address the threat of patent trolls. Topics discussed include the nature of patent trolls, the Innovation Act introduced by Representative Bob Goodlatte, the Transparency and Accountability in Patents Act introduced by Senator Claire...

  • Why Patent Reform Matters to Banks. Finkle, Victoria // American Banker;12/ 9/2013, Vol. 178 Issue 187, p7 

    The article focuses on the Innovation Act, introduced by the U.S. House Judiciary Chairman Robert Goodlatte, and its importance to the banks in deterring the efforts of the patent trolls looking for financial gain. Topics discussed trolls cite the use of technology in violation to the patents...

  • Identity crisis. DiMarco, Chris // InsideCounsel;Mar2014, Vol. 24 Issue 267, p34 

    The article focuses on trends in intellectual property litigation in the U.S. Topics discussed include an increase in the number of patent lawsuits filed by non-practicing entities (NPE) in 2013, a growing awareness about the value of intellectual property, and strategies for successful patent...

  • Returning Trolls to Myth. Warner, Scott // Hospitality Upgrade;Summer2014, p34 

    The article focuses on trolls that now connected with non-practicing entities (NPE). It states that NPEs file the majority of patent litigation and the total costs of NPE patent suits exceed the societal benefits of patent ownership. It further discusses the growing interest and activity...

  • Patent Trolls Add to 'Judicial Hellhole' Label. HARTLEY, David // State Journal (WV);8/14/2015, Vol. 31 Issue 32, p28 

    No abstract available.

  • Vermont Enacts Legislation Against Patent Trolls. Judge Jr., Walter E.; Poehlmann, Eric A. // Intellectual Property Litigation;Winter2014, Vol. 25 Issue 2, p2 

    The article reports on the enactment of anti-patent troll law in Vermont in January 2014. Topics mentioned include the legal ability of companies in the state to file a patent infringement lawsuit against patent trolls, the initiative of the Vermont government to improve its economy by helping...

  • CEA Throws Support Behind SHIELD Act To Stop 'Patent Trolls'. Smith, Steve // TWICE: This Week in Consumer Electronics;5/6/2013, Vol. 28 Issue 10, p10 

    The article reports that the American Consumer Electronics Association (CEA) lobbied the U.S. Congress for passage of the "Saving High-Tech Innovators from Egregious Legal Disputes (SHIELD) Act," to stop "patent trolls" from filing frivolous lawsuits against tech companies.

  • Data makes the difference (Part 2). Yen, Mallun // InsideCounsel;Jan2014, Vol. 24 Issue 265, p43 

    The article explores the central dynamic of non-practicing entity (NPE) patent suits and how such type of litigation is not really designed to determine right or wrong. It mentions the capability of NPE litigations to view as more akin to financial transactions than true disputes over legal...

  • Learning from Rambus--How to tame those troublesome trolls. Culley, Daniel; Dhanani, Malik; Dolmans, Maurits // Antitrust Bulletin;Spring2012, Vol. 57 Issue 1, p117 

    The article discusses nonpracticing entities (patent trolls) and the 2006 legal case In re Rambus Inc., focusing on antitrust law and excessive pricing issues related to patents, as well as an analysis of the court's ruling in the case Broadcom Corp. v. Qualcomm Inc. The impact of standard...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics