TITLE

Are antiabortion activists `racketeers'?

PUB. DATE
December 1993
SOURCE
U.S. News & World Report;12/13/93, Vol. 115 Issue 23, p12
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Reports that abortion-rights advocates are asking the Supreme Court to authorize use of RICO--the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organization Act--against anyone who coordinates an anticlinic attack. Why activists in other movements wish the feminists would forget RICO; Where American Civil Liberties Union stands on the issue.
ACCESSION #
9312077611

 

Related Articles

  • Pro-lifers' new legal nightmare. McFarland, Steven T. // Christianity Today;8/15/94, Vol. 38 Issue 9, p18 

    Editorial. Comments on the implications of the enactment of the Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances (FACE) Act of 1994. Influence of the abortion-rights activists in the Bill Clinton administration; Exploitation of the shooting of abortionists in Florida and Kansas; Potential victims and...

  • RICO threatens protest and free speech. Thomas, Cal // Human Events;05/29/98, Vol. 54 Issue 21, p9 

    Presents information relating to the Racketeer Influenced Corrupt Organization Act, with reference to abortion in the United States. Function of the act; Conviction of two pro-life groups and three pro-life leaders for extortion; Impact of the act on the 1st Amendment; Reference to the book...

  • Congress restricts dissent tactics of pro-life activists. Kennedy, John W. // Christianity Today;1/10/94, Vol. 38 Issue 1, p55 

    Portrays pro-life groups as poised to challenge the legality of the Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances Act (FACE) passed by Congress in November 1993. Comment by Judie Brown of American Life League; Why peaceful protest would be a federal crime under FACE; Operation Rescue National (ORN); More.

  • US doctors file lawsuit against antiabortionists. Charatan, Fred // BMJ: British Medical Journal (International Edition);01/23/99, Vol. 318 Issue 7178, p214 

    Reports on a civil lawsuit filed against several antiabortion groups by Planned Parenthood and doctors who conduct abortion. Information on the 1994 Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances Act; Amount sought by the plaintiffs for damages.

  • Q: Are additional laws needed to restrain antiabortion activists? Finley, Lucinda M.; Prior, Karen Swallow // Insight on the News;02/15/99, Vol. 15 Issue 6, p24 

    Provides two opposing views on the issue on additional laws to restrain antiabortion activists. Bill modeled on the Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances Act (FACE); Opinions of abortion advocates; Function of clinic-access laws; Information on the antiabortion protest movement.

  • Anti-abortion Web sites: free speech or `threats'? Knickerbocker, Brad // Christian Science Monitor;1/12/99, Vol. 91 Issue 32, p1 

    Describes an Oregon lawsuit which tests the extent to which antiabortion activists can publicize personal information about abortion providers. Use of Web sites by radical abortion opponents; Assertion that the sites advocate violence; Restriction of pro-life protests outside clinics under the...

  • Protesting Abortion. Gaffney, Jr., Edward McGlynn // Commonweal;03/26/99, Vol. 126 Issue 6, p11 

    Focuses on activities protesting abortion. Case in Oregon which imposed civil liability on anti-abortion protesters for activity that abortion providers found threatening; Standard of protection for political protest set by the United States (US) Supreme Court; Concerns regarding the use of the...

  • Scheidler v. NOW. Caro, Richard P. // America;4/7/2003, Vol. 188 Issue 12, p18 

    Discusses the decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in Scheidler v. National Organization of Women, Inc. (NOW). Question of whether the pro-life abortion demonstrations of the 1980s and 1990s constituted acts of extortion under the federal extortion statute, the Hobbs Act; Ruling of the Supreme...

  • House refuses to protect pro-lifers' rights.  // Human Events;12/4/93, Vol. 53 Issue 49, p18 

    Presents the November 18, 1993 House rollcall vote on the rejection of a substitute amendment to the Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances Act (HR 796). Punishments for blockading clinics by anti-abortionists; Arguments against the bill; Breakdown of votes.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics