TITLE

The cost of keeping and debating a diary

PUB. DATE
November 1993
SOURCE
U.S. News & World Report;11/15/93, Vol. 115 Issue 19, p14
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Focuses on the Senate Ethics Committee investigation of Oregon Senator Bob Packwood who has been charged with sexual harassment. Debate over whether to subpoena Packwood's diaries; Business the Senate put off while debating the diary question; Publishers scrabbling for the diaries; What other star diaries are worth.
ACCESSION #
9311097630

 

Related Articles

  • Sent packing. Brinkley, Alan // New Yorker;9/18/95, Vol. 71 Issue 28, p9 

    Focuses on Bob Packwood's expulsion from Congress. Extraction of sexual favors; Changes in Senate in years recent to 1995; Congress' repudiation of Packwood as due to fears rather than standards.

  • A pack of woes for Packwood.  // U.S. News & World Report;12/7/92, Vol. 113 Issue 22, p12 

    Reports that allegations against Sen. Bob Packwood have put his 24-year Senate career in jeopardy. According to the `Washington Post,' the Oregon Republican made unwanted sexual advances on at least 10 female staffers and lobbyists, including one as far back as 1969. Packwood's denial of the...

  • The case of the senator's diaries. Borger, Gloria // U.S. News & World Report;11/8/93, Vol. 115 Issue 18, p49 

    Discusses the diaries of Senator Bob Packwood and the debate over whether the Senate Ethics Committee should be allowed to view the diaries. Possible incriminating item found in the diary by the committee; Rejection by senator of an offer to allow a neutral third party to vet the diaries...

  • The ogre's tale. Boyer, Peter J. // New Yorker;4/4/94, Vol. 70 Issue 7, p36 

    Features Senator Bob Packwood after the sex scandal that hit him in November 1993. Reactions peers and colleagues; Effect of the scandal on Packwood; Tarnished reputation as a champion for women's causes; Number of years as a senator; Subpoena from the Senate's Ethics Committee for Packwood's...

  • No thanks for the memories. Smolowe, Jill; Sachs, Andrea // Time;11/8/1993, Vol. 142 Issue 19, p41 

    Describes how Senator Bob Packwood's (R-Oreg.) clumsy attempts to elude further scrutiny of his diaries (he has already released some 5,000 pages but retains 3,200 more) has fueled the determination of the ethics committee. His not-so-veiled threats from the Senate floor; Assertion by Sen....

  • Hard uses of soft money. Schorr, Daniel // New Leader;10/9/95, Vol. 78 Issue 8, p4 

    Focuses on the forced resignation of Senator Bob Packwood. Packwood's legislative misconduct at the American public's expense; Packwood's documentation of his corrupt actions in his diaries.

  • Women strike back.  // Time;12/7/1992, Vol. 140 Issue 23, p23 

    Considers a `Washington Post' report which found at least ten women who gave specific accounts of sexual harassment over a 20-year period by Senator Bob Packwood (R-Oreg.), while former Oregon Supreme Court Justice Betty Roberts has called for his resignation. Packwood, who was narrowly elected...

  • TAX REFORM NOTIONS FOR DAN AND BOB.  // Fortune;8/4/1986, Vol. 114 Issue 3, p150 

    Dan Rostenkowski and Bob Packwood will both have to avoid and ignore the political consequences of angered special interest groups if they are to develop a new tax plan that is fairer, simpler and more growth oriented than any plan in the past.

  • Packwood's next battle? Tanaka, Jennifer; Van Boven, Sarah // Newsweek;8/7/1995, Vol. 126 Issue 6, p6 

    Reports that the Senate ethics committee may recommend that the entire Senate vote on whether to strip Oregon Senator Bob Packwood of his chairmanship of the Senate Finance Committee, rather than let Senate Republicans decide his fate. Packwood's sexual-misconduct charges; Why the committee is...

Share

Read the Article

Other Topics