TITLE

Slow going

PUB. DATE
November 1993
SOURCE
U.S. News & World Report;11/8/93, Vol. 115 Issue 18, p22
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Discusses the slow progress that is taking place in the former Soviet Union's disarmament process. Belarus only state to keep a 1992 promise to ratify the START I and Nuclear Nonproliferation treaties and begin transferring all nuclear warheads to Russia for destruction; Amount of money Ukraine wants for dismantlement; Kazakhstan already ratified START I and expected to ratify the NPT by the end of 1993.
ACCESSION #
9311037547

 

Related Articles

  • John Lloyd. Lloyd, John // New Statesman;6/21/96, Vol. 125 Issue 4289, p33 

    Comments on the issue of nuclear disarmament in Great Britain. Reduction in Britain's nuclear force; Assumption on the need for a nuclear deterrent; Importance of reciprocity in nuclear disarmament.

  • Finishing the job: What should be done with nuclear arsenals? Renner, Michael // USA Today Magazine;Jan94, Vol. 122 Issue 2584, p15 

    Discusses the issues and implications of nuclear disarmament. Criticalness of implementation steps for disarmament; Importance of inspection and verification system; Methods of disposal for weapons-grade uranium; Options for plutonium; Concept of minimal deterrence; Future of the Nuclear...

  • Fact sheet: Safe and secure dismantlement of nuclear weapons in the new independent states.  // U.S. Department of State Dispatch;1/3/94, Vol. 5 Issue 1, p6 

    Provides information on funding through the Nunn-Lugar program authorizing Department of Defense funds to be spent in the new independent states of the former Soviet Union for the non-proliferation and safe and secure dismantlement (SSD) of nuclear weapons. SSD projects by country; Belarus;...

  • The United States and North Korea reach agreement on nuclear program. Clinton, William J.; Gallucci, Robert // U.S. Department of State Dispatch;10/31/94, Vol. 5 Issue 44, p721 

    Presents speeches made by the President of the United States and the US Ambassador-at-Large at a White House briefing on October 18, 1994. Announcement that the United States and North Korea have reached an agreement on North Korea's nuclear program; Details of the agreement; How compliance...

  • US$6 billion for nuke shift. McClenahen, John S. // Industry Week/IW;11/21/94, Vol. 243 Issue 21, p70 

    Reports that the management of North Korea's transition from a nuclear threat to a potential trading partner will cost $6 billion US dollars. Costs of building light-water nuclear power stations; Provision of alternative energy sources.

  • Ukrainian SS-24s slated for prompt deactivation. Mann, Paul // Aviation Week & Space Technology;1/24/1994, Vol. 140 Issue 4, p39 

    Reports on the agreement of Ukraine to have its SS-19 and SS-24 nuclear warheads deactivated in Russia. Need for ratification of the trilateral disarmament agreement by the Ukranian parliament; Announcement of mutual detargetting of Russian and American strategic weapons.

  • Levers of change. Rothschild, Matthew // Progressive;Nov96, Vol. 60 Issue 11, p4 

    Editorial. Focuses on the author's speaking engagement at a conference on disarmament called `Nuclear Abolition 2000.' Event description; Views on nuclear weapons; Quiescence of the peace movement.

  • Giving up the bomb.  // Wilson Quarterly;Winter94, Vol. 18 Issue 1, p131 

    Reviews the article `Why South Africa Gave Up the Bomb?' by J.W. de Villiers, Roger Jardine and Mitchell Reiss, in the November-December 1993 issue of `Policy Review'.

  • No-nuke millennium. Deen, Thalif // New Internationalist;Oct98, Issue 306, p4 

    States that a group of United Nations member countries are promoting a resolution which request total elimination of nuclear weapons. Reference to a joint declaration between Ireland and Sweden; Countries which signed the declaration; Identification of countries which were requested to commit...

Share

Read the Article

Other Topics