Dumbing down

October 1993
U.S. News & World Report;10/25/93, Vol. 115 Issue 16, p15
Discusses the problem of finding competent jurors for high-profile cases. Only a few juror candidates are available because many potential jurors are dismissed because they have heard about the crime or are deemed bias; Argument by some experts that potential jurors are rejected too quickly; In centuries past a juror's knowledge of a crime was an asset.


Related Articles

  • Rigged: Racial Bias in Jury Selection. Morial, Marc H. // Washington Informer;11/12/2015, Vol. 51 Issue 5, p27 

    The author claims that racial discrimination in the jury selection process continues throughout the criminal justice system despite the efforts of the federal government and the U.S. Supreme Court to address and eliminate the practice.

  • Current Legal Literature. Keeffe, Arthur John // American Bar Association Journal;Oct75, Vol. 61 Issue 10, p1276 

    Comments of periodical articles about law and other legal issues in the United States compiled as of as of October 1, 1975. Civil arbitration of private criminal complaints; Jury selection; Conflict between racial discrimination and freedom of speech.

  • Presumed Fair? Voir Dire on the Fundamentals of our Criminal Justice System. Johnson, Vida B. // Seton Hall Law Review;2015, Vol. 45 Issue 2, p545 

    The American criminal justice system is built on three bedrock principles: the presumption of innocence, the burden of proof, and the standard of proof beyond a reasonable doubt. These ideals, however, are frequently ignored by jurors. Social science research has shown that jurors routinely...

  • Casual Ostracism: Jury Exclusion on the Basis of Criminal Convictions. Roberts, Anna // Minnesota Law Review;2013, Vol. 98 Issue 2, p592 

    The article discusses casual ostracism in relation to statutory exclusions which prevent people with felony criminal convictions from serving on juries in various U.S. states as of December 2013, focusing on the American criminal justice system and disqualifications of some potential jurors in...

  • Crime and punishment from lab to courtroom. Arenofsky, Janice // Career World;Feb96, Vol. 24 Issue 5, p16 

    Focuses on the criminal justice system in the United States. Parts of the criminal justice system; Employment opportunities in the criminal justice system. INSET: Crimes against nature..

  • National Assessment Program.  // FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin;Oct95, Vol. 64 Issue 10, p22 

    Presents the 1994 survey results of the National Assessment Program on the needs of the criminal justice system in the United States. Problems most commonly encountered by law enforcers; Responses to crime; Gangs and gang-related crimes; Jail and prison crowding; Emerging issues.

  • Bulletin reports. Waggoner, Kim // FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin;Sep97, Vol. 66 Issue 9, p6 

    Offers a collection of criminal justice studies, reports, and project findings in the United States. Survey on gun ownership in the United States; Presale background checks on potential handgun buyers; Overview of crime analysis report; Report examining the nature of law enforcement stress.

  • Victims and the exclusionary rule. Lungren, Daniel E. // Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy;Spring96, Vol. 19 Issue 3, p695 

    Focuses on the criminal justice system in the United States. Expansions in the definition of victim; Exclusionary rules; Credibility of the system.

  • Punishment vs. rehabilitation: A proposal for revising sentencing practices. De Luca, H.R.; Miller, Thomas J. // Federal Probation;Sep91, Vol. 55 Issue 3, p37 

    Focuses on the criminal justice system in the United States. Objectives of the criminal justice system; Separation of punishment from rehabilitation; Elements of the proposed criminal justice system; Time as punishment tool; Diminishing punishment value of time; Punitive but humane prisons;...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics