TITLE

Wal-Mart's price war: David versus Goliath

PUB. DATE
October 1993
SOURCE
U.S. News & World Report;10/25/93, Vol. 115 Issue 16, p14
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Focuses on a ruling by an Arkansas judge in October 1993 that ruled that Wal-Mart's prices were too low and that the chain had engaged in predatory pricing practices. Illegally priced drug and health care items below cost as a way of driving smaller competitors out of business; Amount of money Wal-Mart will have to pay three independent pharmacies; The overall impact on consumers.
ACCESSION #
9310197567

 

Related Articles

  • Payback? Ukens, Carol // Drug Topics;9/4/95, Vol. 139 Issue 17, p22 

    Reports that 18 Arkansas pharmacists have filed a lawsuit in state court seeking overtime pay from Wal-Mart. Claims made by the pharmacists; Filing of a similar lawsuit by ex-Wal-Mart pharmacists in Colorado.

  • Supreme Court rules Wal-Mart winner in Ark. Ramey, Joanna // WWD: Women's Wear Daily;1/10/1995, Vol. 169 Issue 6, p2 

    Reports on the Arkansas Supreme Court's ruling on the Wal-Mart Stores case. Allegations of predatory pricing; Wal-Mart defense arguments; Favorable decision issued in favor of Wal-Mart.

  • Rivals don't see Wal-Mart easing its price cutting. Brookman, Faye // WWD: Women's Wear Daily;10/22/1993, Vol. 166 Issue 79, p1 

    Reports on speculations regarding Wal-Mart Stores Inc.'s lawsuit on violating the Arkansas Unfair Practice Act. Ruling to be appealed; Difficulty in proving the use of competitive prices with the intention of putting competitors out of business; Expectations of copycat lawsuits.

  • Trick or treat in Wal-Mart pricing suit.  // Drug Topics;10/10/94, Vol. 138 Issue 19, p8 

    Reports on the schedule of the Arkansas Supreme Court's deliberation on the discriminatory pricing lawsuit filed against Wal-Mart Stores Inc. by independent pharmacy owners.

  • Wal-Mart plans appeal.  // American Nurseryman;3/1/96, Vol. 183 Issue 5, p10 

    Reports on the plan of the Arizona-based Wal-Mart Stores Inc. to make an appeal to reconsider a federal judge's decision on the sexual harassment suit filed against the company by a former employee.

  • The race card doesn't play against Wal-Mart. Hisey, Pete // Discount Store News;9/16/96, Vol. 35 Issue 18, p16 

    Comments on the series of lawsuits filed against Wal-Mart which alleges discriminatory practices against minority groups by the retail giant. Description of two cases; Author's own experience with Wal-Mart associates; Warm racial climate at Wal-Mart in comparison with other retailers.

  • Trial set for Wal-Mart over use of `Sam's' name.  // Discount Store News;11/1/93, Vol. 32 Issue 21, p51 

    Reports on the beginning of the trial for Wal-Mart's use of the Sam's name for its clubs in Chicago, Illinois. Suit by Sam's Wine and Liquors for Wal-Mart's alleged violation of trademark laws; Claims of the liquor retailer; Rejection of Wal-Mart's request for a favorable summary judgement.

  • Wal-Mart predatory suit goes to judge.  // Drug Topics;9/6/93, Vol. 137 Issue 17, p6 

    Reports on a lawsuit against Wal-Mart Stores filed in an Arkansas court. Allegations of predatory pricing; Independent pharmacy-owners as plaintiffs; Significance of the lawsuit to other discounters.

  • Pharmacy owners await outcome of Wal-Mart lawsuit. Ukens., Carol // Drug Topics;9/20/93, Vol. 137 Issue 18, p80 

    Reports on the filing of a lawsuit by three Arkansas independent pharmacy owners against Wal-Mart Stores Inc. for predatory pricing meant drive them out of business. Twenty days to file and answer legal briefs about the case; Perceived violation of the Arkansas Unfair Practice Act by selling at...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics