Radical feminism in the Senate

Leo, John
July 1993
U.S. News & World Report;7/19/93, Vol. 115 Issue 3, p19
Focuses on the proposed Violence Against Women Act of 1993, sponsored by Sen. Joseph Biden. How the bill would turn many rapes and much domestic violence into federal civil-rights violations; How bill would bog courts down and further burden already bloated judicial system; Other aspects of bill including allowance of victims of gender-based violence to sue in federal courts for compensatory and punitive damages; Views of radical feminists.


Related Articles

  • A thirteenth amendment defense of the violence against... Hearn, Marcellene Elizabeth // University of Pennsylvania Law Review;Apr98, Vol. 146 Issue 4, p1097 

    Argues that Section 2 of the Thirteenth Amendment to the 1994 Violence Against Women Act (VAWA) is an alternative source of Congress's power to create a cause of action for private discrimination. Civil rights remedy of the VAWA; Challenges to this remedy; Settled interpretation of the...

  • Violence against women act II.  // Off Our Backs;Jun98, Vol. 28 Issue 6, p6 

    Focuses on the introduction of the Violence Against Women Act II, which was designed to offer additional funding and legal protections for victims of domestic violence in Congress. Details on the bill; What the act has achieved; Estimated number of sponsors for the bill.

  • Rape is not an act of bias. Leo, J. // U.S. News & World Report;10/8/90, Vol. 109 Issue 14, p25 

    Considers the Violence Against Women Act of 1990 which brings rape and wife beating under the umbrella of civil-rights protection and argues that these are acts of prejudice and discrimination. Local crimes being federalized; American habit of reducing almost all social problems to ones of bias;...

  • THE COURT DRAWS A LINE.  // Christian Science Monitor;5/17/2000, Vol. 92 Issue 123, p10 

    Offers observations about the Supreme Court decision to not uphold the Violence Against Women Act which was intended to strengthen a women's ability to seek damages for acts of violence.

  • Rights of women v. states hits high court. Richey, Warren // Christian Science Monitor;1/11/2000, Vol. 92 Issue 34, p1 

    Discusses the deliberation of the United States Supreme Court regarding the 1994 Violence Against Women Act that allows victims of gender-motivated violence to sue their attackers for monetary damage. Whether the law is a federal or state issue.

  • Making amends. Fenyvesi, C. // U.S. News & World Report;11/4/91, Vol. 111 Issue 19, p31 

    Reports that the Senate, stung by the feminist outcry over the handling of the Clarence Thomas-Anita Hill imbroglio, will try to make amends by expediting the so-called Violence Against Women legislation. One of the provisions of the bill concerning rape; The House reaction toward the measure;...

  • Uncomfortable Truths About The Violence Against Women Act. ESMAY, DEAN // Moderate Voice;3/15/2012, p11 

    A blog related to the U.S. Violence Against Women Act is discussed.

  • Small steps forward and back.  // Off Our Backs;Oct96, Vol. 26 Issue 9, p4 

    Focuses on court's policy of the United States with regards to the survivors of rape. Rape survivor's sexual orientation as an invalid evidence in a rape trial; Unconstitutionality of charging attackers for damages in federal court; Effectivity of the Violence Against Women Act of 1994 on rape...

  • Judge rejects U.S. law for abuse victims. Severson, Kristin // Off Our Backs;Oct96, Vol. 26 Issue 9, p6 

    Reports on the rejection of a US District Judge Jackson L. Kiser of the 1994 Violence Against Women Act giving physically abused women the right to sue their attackers for damages as applied to the case filed by Virginia Tech student, Christy Brzonkaia. Effect of attacks on the job performance...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics