TITLE

Science in the courtroom

PUB. DATE
July 1993
SOURCE
U.S. News & World Report;7/12/93, Vol. 115 Issue 2, p19
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Reports that last week, the Supreme Court set a standard on scientific evidence that would be allowed in courtrooms. Brief details on case involving a drug blamed for birth defects; Other example of science in the courtroom involving freed prisoner Kirk Bloodsworth.
ACCESSION #
9307070031

 

Related Articles

  • Court Ruling Allows Lawyers Discrimination Suit Leeway. Czurak, David // Grand Rapids Business Journal;06/26/2000, Vol. 18 Issue 26, p3 

    Reports on the significance of and reactions to a ruling by the United States Supreme Court that requires direct evidence of employee discrimination in discrimination cases. Impossibility of providing evidence of discrimination; Concern of some attorneys that the ruling will increase the number...

  • Edward Schwartz responds to Colin Miller. Schwartz, Edward P. // Jury Expert;Mar2010, Vol. 22 Issue 2, p70 

    The article presents the authors' reaction to the article on the application of Federal Rules of Evidence (FRE) 606 (b) to allegations of jurors' biases by Colin Miller. According to the author, he is not entirely persuaded that Miller's approach can circumvent the logic of Federal Rules of...

  • Julie Blackman & Ellen Brickman Respond To Colin Miller. Blackman, Julie; Brickman, Ellen // Jury Expert;Mar2010, Vol. 22 Issue 2, p72 

    The article presents the authors' reaction to the article on the application of Federal Rules of Evidence (FRE) 606 (b) to allegations of jurors' biases by Colin Miller. The authors argue that the recommendation of Miller that jurors need to be screened for prejudice during voir dire is...

  • GEORGIA'S NEW EVIDENCE CODE - AN OVERVIEW. Milich, Paul S. // Georgia State University Law Review;Winter2012, Vol. 28 Issue 2, p379 

    The article provides an overview of the new set of evidence rules in Georgia that will take effect starting January 1, 2013. It states that the state's existing rules are mostly found in the Code of 1863. It offers a brief history of the 26-year-effort to come up with evidence rules for the...

  • Noticeboard. Pattenden, Rosemary // International Journal of Evidence & Proof;Jun2011, Vol. 15 Issue 3, p273 

    The article presents several notices related to law commissions in several countries including England, India, and Australia. It mentions that the law commission in England and Wales have set out measures that courts can use in reducing evidences used in criminal trials. It states that the...

  • A New and Controversial Scenario in the Gathering of Evidence at the European Level: The Proposal for a Directive on the European Investigation Order. Mangiaracina, Annalisa // Utrecht Law Review;Jan2014, Vol. 10 Issue 1, p113 

    The article reports on the proposal for guides or directives on the European Investigation Order (EIO). Topics discussed include the differences between mutual recognition and mutual legal assistance, the mutual recognition principle in the evidence field, and the scope of EIO. Also mentioned...

  • Not very Secret Service. Howard, Lucy; Gajilan, Arlyn Tobias // Newsweek;6/1/1998, Vol. 131 Issue 22, p4 

    Reports the May 1998 decision of a United States federal judge that Secret Service agents can be compelled to testify in independent counsel Kenneth Starr's investigation of President Bill Clinton's relationship with Monica Lewinsky. The diplomatic consequences of the decision.

  • ON RACE THEORY AND NORMS. Sundquist, Christian // Albany Law Review;2009, Vol. 72 Issue 4, p953 

    The article addresses the judicial acceptance of DNA random match estimates, which is using DNA analysis to predict the possibility that a criminal defendant is the source of genetic material found at a crime scene that rely on race. It discusses a sketch of the historical development of the...

  • Judges' gatekeeper role expanded. Savage, David G. // ABA Journal;Feb98, Vol. 84 Issue 2, p41 

    Reports on the US Supreme Court's 8-1 ruling which stressed that trial judges are to play the role of gatekeepers in cases where scientific testimony may be introduced as in the case of `General Electric v. Joiner.' Highlights of the Joiner case; Terms and conditions of the 8-1 ruling; Cases...

Share

Read the Article

Other Topics