A zero-sum game in the world of science

July 1993
U.S. News & World Report;7/5/93, Vol. 115 Issue 1, p11
Reports that uncharacteristically, leaders of science have suggested that more funding isn't necessary to keep the United States a leader in research and technology and that some fields should get less so others can grow. Brief details on a National Academy of Sciences report which calls for experts' panels to rate progress in fields with an eye to federal funding decisions.


Related Articles

  • How federal `guesswork' misleads consumers.  // Consumers' Research Magazine;Jan1995, Vol. 78 Issue 1, p10 

    Presents an excerpt of the report `Choices In Risk Assessment,' sponsored by the United States Department of Energy, which claims that consumers are being misled by science policy disclosures based on assumptions and not on scientific facts. Science policy issues and corresponding default...

  • Science, scientists and the science budget. Bromley, D. Allan // Issues in Science & Technology;Fall92, Vol. 9 Issue 1, p41 

    Analyzes the difficulty of arriving at a science budget due to its complexity and the multidimensionality of the objectives for research and development support. Different but related objectives of research and development; Academic research in universities and colleges; Roles of scientific and...

  • Getting serious about science-policy reform. Boucher, Rick // Issues in Science & Technology;Winter93/94, Vol. 10 Issue 2, p25 

    Focuses on the need to establish ways to set priorities and to strengthen links between science and broader social concerns. Fundamental change in science and technology policy; Major reforms in the policy; Consolidated research and development (R&D) budget; Need for a permanent science and...

  • The need for a Department of Science. Walker, Robert S. // Issues in Science & Technology;Summer95, Vol. 11 Issue 4, p19 

    Discusses the author's proposal for the creation of a Department of Science in the US. Reasons for the same; Combining the existing science elements of the Departments of Commerce and of Energy; Role of science in making of government decisions; Objection made by the presidential science...

  • Do we need a Department of Science? Gibbons, John H. // Issues in Science & Technology;Summer95, Vol. 11 Issue 4, p22 

    Discusses a proposal for the creation of a US Department of Science. Effect on science and technology (S&T) if they are put under a single banner; Economic diversity of funding sources for S&T; Details of the functioning of S&T; Drawbacks on the creation of a Department of Science; Question of...

  • State support helps French to flourish. Holderness, M. // New Scientist;2/1/92, Vol. 133 Issue 1806, p50 

    Takes a look at how the French government supports the science book and magazine industry in that country. Headaches that government intervention causes; Government will pay for translation of books; French science publishing seems destined to become more cosmopolitan. INSET: Why the book you...

  • And so to bed. Dalyell, T. // New Scientist;2/1/92, Vol. 133 Issue 1806, p58 

    Reports on news and information regarding the British Parliament and the sciences. Prime minister's reasons why he supported the retention of the principle of unanimity by the Council of Ministers when adopting multinational framework programs setting out the European Community's activities in...

  • Committee call.  // New Scientist;5/9/92, Vol. 134 Issue 1820, p11 

    Reports that MPs from all parties want to set up a select committee on science and technology to monitor the government's handling of scientific issues and the work of the newly created Office of Science and Technology. Current arrangement is not satisfactory; The only scrutiny of science...

  • Britain establishes cabinet-level science portfolio.  // Physics Today;Jul92, Vol. 45 Issue 7, p60 

    Reports that England's Prime Minister John Major has given a Cabinet member, John Waldegrave, central responsibility for science and technology policy. Concurrent creation of an Office of Science and Technology under chief scientific adviser William Stewart, who in turn reports to Waldegrave...

  • Bush and Clinton: Comparing the candidates. Goodwin, Irwin // Physics Today;Oct92, Vol. 45 Issue 10, p101 

    Presents President George Bush and Governor Bill Clinton's responses to ten questions presented by `Physics Today' on issues of science, technology, arms control, energy and the environment, and government participation in R&D. How to provide adequate government funding for scientific research...


Read the Article

Other Topics