TITLE

PUBLIC WORKS WON'T WORK

AUTHOR(S)
Reynolds, Alan
PUB. DATE
March 1993
SOURCE
National Review;3/15/1993, Vol. 45 Issue 5, p50
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article contends that U.S. President Bill Clinton's plan to increase infrastructure spending will not improve economic growth. This plan is supported by economist David Aschauer of Bates College. According to Aschauer, through government investments in infrastructure, private sectors experienced an increase in productivity. However, many disclaim the idea that infrastructure spending will speed up economic growth. Many believe that government investment could impact private productivity, and the usual explanation is that well-maintained highways reduce transportation time.
ACCESSION #
9303040068

 

Related Articles

  • State builds for its people. Roscoe, Andrew // MEED: Middle East Economic Digest;7/16/2010, Vol. 54 Issue 29, p38 

    The article reports that projects market in Kuwait is moving ahead as the government is investing on infrastructure projects to meet the needs of its rapidly growing population. Kuwait's population has shown a steady growth of 2.5-3 percent in recent years. Its population is expected to rise...

  • Infrastructure: Guide to Critical Analysis.  // Points of View: Infrastructure;2017, p4 

    The article offers a critical guide to the controversial issue of infrastructure. The article discusses criteria in understanding the issue, such as distinguishing between fact and opinion and recognizing point and counterpoint arguments. Also presented are exercises that help the reader further...

  • How Quickly We Forget. Rubenstein, Ed // National Review;8/1/1994, Vol. 46 Issue 14, p17 

    This article analyzes the growth of the U.S. government by administration from the presidency of John F. Kennedy in 1964 through that of Bill Clinton during the first two years in office. It was noted that despite the defense development, total federal spending grew more slowly during the...

  • BUDGET BLUSTER.  // New Republic;2/12/96, Vol. 214 Issue 7, p7 

    Discusses issues concerning the appropriation of the U.S. federal budget as of February 12, 1996. Findings of a Gallup Poll on the views of voters on the problems faced by the country; Differences between the budget proposals of President Bill Clinton and the Republican members of Congress;...

  • Global Overview.  // Australia Infrastructure Report;Q4 2009, p10 

    The article provides an overview of the global increase in infrastructure spending in 2009. It states that this initiative was led by the multi-billion dollar pledges from the U.S. and China. It mentions that the European Commission is channeling funds for infrastructure projects. Meanwhile...

  • U.S. Infrastructure: Agencies' Approaches to Developing Investment Estimates Vary: GAO-01-835.  // GAO Reports;7/20/2001, p1 

    A sound public infrastructure plays a vital role in encouraging a more productive and competitive national economy and meeting public demands for safety, health, and improved quality of life. The federal government has spent an average of $149 billion (in constant 1998 dollars) annually since...

  • Some laser programs take a hit in federal budget. Kiernan, Vincent // Laser Focus World;Apr2000, Vol. 36 Issue 4, p64 

    Offers a look at the budget proposal of United States President Bill Clinton which includes laser-related projects for 2001. Comments from Senator Pete V. Domenici on the budget request of the president; Effort made by the Department of Energy in increasing funds for research in the area of...

  • Serious About Limiting Government? Suderman, Peter // Reason;May2013, Vol. 45 Issue 1, p18 

    The article offers information on the downsizing of the government and reduction in the government expenditure during the presidency term of former U.S. President Bill Clinton.

  • Spend-Thrifts. Cohn, Peter // Electronic Ardell Wellness Report (E-AWR);5/6/2005, Issue 282, p9 

    The article focuses on the spending's by the government in the United States. After holding domestic discretionary spending to a less than 1 percent increase in FY05, and with cuts across a broad swath of programs slated for FY06, some small government advocates are lamenting the lost...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics