Ill--but willing to work

Saltzman, Amy
January 1993
U.S. News & World Report;1/25/93, Vol. 114 Issue 3, p71
Discusses how new laws like the Americans with Disabilities Act, along with a more enlightened corporate attitude toward AIDS as the epidemic has spread, have made it tougher for employers to discriminate against disabled or sick employees. A time of deep ambivalence toward the working ill; Obstacles sick employees face; Examples of sick employees; Communication with a supervisor is key; Being flexible; More. INSET: When bosses cut benefits..


Related Articles

  • Blacks in law firms.  // Black Enterprise;Nov84, Vol. 15 Issue 4, p63 

    A recent Supreme Court ruling puts partnerships under affirmative action laws. However, there is still a question about America's law firms being willing to make Blacks partners.

  • Job bias law does not apply abroad.  // Corporate Board;Jul/Aug90, Vol. 11 Issue 63, p27 

    Reports that a federal appeals court in New Orleans has ruled that Americans working in foreign offices of American companies are not covered by the civil rights law.

  • Employment Nondiscrimination.  // Congressional Digest;Nov96, Vol. 75 Issue 11, p264 

    Discusses the Employment Nondiscrimination Act (ENDA) that was introduced in the 104th US Congress in 1996. Discrimination provisions of the bill; Who must comply with the bill; The US Armed Forces, which are required to comply with the bill; How ENDA would be enforced; Remedies for those who...

  • Should the Senate Approve S. 2056, the Employment Nondiscrimination Act? PROS. Kennedy, Edward M.; Jeffords, James M. // Congressional Digest;Nov96, Vol. 75 Issue 11, p266 

    Presents arguments from the proponents of US Senate bill S. 2056, the Employment Nondiscrimination Act. The Honorable Edward M. Kennedy, Massachusetts, Democrat; The Honorable James M. Jeffords, Vermont, Republican; The Honorable J. Robert Kerrey, Nebraska, Democrat; The Honorable Paul Simon,...

  • Should the Senate Approve S. 2056, the Employment Nondiscrimination Act? CONS. Hatch, Orrin G.; Kassebaum, Nancy Landon // Congressional Digest;Nov96, Vol. 75 Issue 11, p267 

    Presents arguments from the opponents of S. 2056, the Employment Nondiscrimination Act. The Honorable Orrin G. Hatch, Utah, Republican; The Honorable Nancy Landon Kassebaum, Kansas, Republican; The Honorable Don Nickles, Oklahoma, Republican; The Honorable Paul D. Coverdell, Georgia,...

  • Election of remedies in employment discrimination law: Doorway into the legal hall of mirrors. Belt, David C. // Case Western Reserve Law Review;Fall95, Vol. 46 Issue 1, p145 

    Analyzes the different aspects of the employment discrimination crisis. Problems faced by a complainant alleging employment discrimination; Theoretical underpinnings of employment discrimination law; Inherent weaknesses of reform proposals.

  • Reagan administration debates affirmative action.  // Newsweek;12/30/1985, Vol. 106 Issue 27, p66 

    The Reagan Administration is embroiled in a high-level internal conflict over affirmative action, with Attorney General Edwin Meese locked in battle with Labor Secretary Bill Brock over the law promoting quotas for hiring blacks and women. See also (Time, 12/23/85, p25, 1/3p)

  • WASHINGTON, D.C.  // Gay & Lesbian Times;10/1/2009, Issue 1136, p19 

    The article reports on the move of Massachusetts Representatives Barney Frank and Tammy Baldwin to pass a job discrimination bill that would protect gays and transsexuals from workplace bias in Washington, D.C.

  • Immediate suit available for sex discrimination. Murphy, B.S.; Barlow, W. // Personnel Journal;Mar91, Vol. 70 Issue 3, p20 

    Reports that the California Supreme Court held that Califoria's Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA) does not provide an exclusive remedy for injuries relating to sex discrimination in employment. Other related rulings by the court; Details; Impact.

  • State agency may not award compensatory damages. Murphy, B.S.; Barlow, W. // Personnel Journal;Mar91, Vol. 70 Issue 3, p21 

    Reports that the California Supreme Court held that the California Fair Employment and Housing Commission (FEHC) does not have statutory authority to award compensatory damages to victims of employment discrimination for emotional distress. Details; Impact.


Read the Article

Courtesy of

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics