TITLE

Washington Office Bonds Illegal, Judge Rules; Buyers Find Hope

AUTHOR(S)
Shields, Yvette
PUB. DATE
February 2003
SOURCE
Bond Buyer;2/28/2003, Vol. 343 Issue 31583, p1
SOURCE TYPE
Trade Publication
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Reports on the decision of an Island County, Washington Superior Court judge to declare the sale of $20 million bonds issued in October 2000 for an office park as illegal. Impact of the decision on investors; Agency that sold bonds; Investors' opinion about the decision.
ACCESSION #
9254037

 

Related Articles

  • Group's Petition Aims to Stop Reno's Track Project. Williams, Rochelle // Bond Buyer;5/8/2002, Vol. 340 Issue 31382, p5 

    Reports the lawsuits filed by the Citizens for a Public Train Trench Vote against the state in Reno, Nevada. Opposition on the bond sale for track project; Disruption of train traffic; Plan of filing for declaratory injunction.

  • Florida Water Services Hires Law Firm in Dispute Over Utilities' Purchase. Sigo, Shelly // Bond Buyer;11/4/2002, Vol. 342 Issue 31505, p39 

    Reports that the Florida Water Services Authority has hired a law firm to defend its proposed purchase of various privately held water and waste water systems around Florida. Amount of tax-exempt revenue bonds sanctioned by the authority to purchase the system owned by the Florida Water...

  • Legal Threat to Oregon's Lottery-Backed Bonds Disappears. Finestone, Deborah // Bond Buyer;4/2/2002, Vol. 339 Issue 31356, p36 

    Reports on the dismissal of the lawsuit filed by anti-gambling group against lottery-backed bonds in Oregon. Allegations of the group called Oregonians for Gambling Awareness against the 1984 initiative that created the lottery; Reason for the dismissal of the case; Ratings of the bonds.

  • Suit Kills Virginia County Agency's Refunding, Though It May Return. Vadum, Matthew // Bond Buyer;7/1/2002, Vol. 340 Issue 31419, p1 

    Reports the lawsuits filed by residents and taxpayers against the planned refunding of agencies in Loudoun County, Virginia. Cancellation on the lease-revenue bond deal; Details on the initiation of the suit; Rejection on the general obligation bond issue for the government center.

  • LAW CASE REVIEW. Keenan, Denis // Accountancy;Sep86, Vol. 98 Issue 1117, p52 

    Presents review of various law cases in Great Britain as of September 1986. Decision of the High Court regarding the disclosure of debt amount by the debenture holders; Lawsuit regarding the applicability of the principle of caveat emptor; Grant of relief under Part XVII of the Companies Act...

  • West Virginia High Court Throws Roadblock In Front of Lottery Bond Plans. Newman, Emily // Bond Buyer;5/19/2003, Vol. 344 Issue 31638, p6 

    In a decision that could delay West Virginia's plans to issue more than $200 million of lottery-backed revenue bonds for development projects, the state Supreme Court ruled that members of the West Virginia Economic development Grant Committee were unconstitutionally appointed, but upheld its...

  • State High Court Asked To Rule on Soldier Field. Shields, Yvette // Bond Buyer;5/10/2002, Vol. 340 Issue 31384, p4 

    Reports the request of two not-for-profit organizations for the Supreme Court to handle the lawsuit filed against the Chicago Bears in Illinois. Question on the legality of the revenue bond issuance; Violation on the constitution regarding the use of public land; Obstruction on the views of...

  • Attorneys Laud Judge's Discovery Order in Heritage Case. Shields, Yvette // Bond Buyer;10/18/2002, Vol. 342 Issue 31494, p40 

    Reports the lawsuit filed by a bondholder concerning the Heritage Healthcare bond default in Chicago, Illinois. Details of the case; Enhancement of investor protection; Denial of motions for summary judgments.

  • Annual Survey of Fidelity and Surety Law, 2000--Part I. May, Ronald A.; Welbaum, R. Earl; Marmor, Randall I.; Sauer, Roger P.; Linder Jr., Charles W. // Defense Counsel Journal;Jan2001, Vol. 68 Issue 1, p93 

    Presents a summary of cases that covers public and private construction bonds, fidelity and financial institution bonds and sureties remedies. S&G Excavating v. Seaboard Surety Co.; PCC Construction v. Star Insurance Co.; Don Siegel Construction v. Atul Construction.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sign out of this library

Other Topics