Bargain hunters snap up Russian brainpower

Charles, D.
March 1992
New Scientist;3/14/92, Vol. 133 Issue 1812, p13
Reveals that the US Department of Energy will fund research on nuclear fusion at the Kurchatov Institute of Atomic Energy in Moscow. Cost of research; Similar research cost in the United States; Other plans for using Soviet scientists for research projects.


Related Articles

  • Fusion meets the realities of global politics. Butler, Declan // Nature;8/11/1994, Vol. 370 Issue 6489, p403 

    Reports on the factors that may influence the success of international collaborations on science projects. Purpose of the International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor (ITER) project; Role of politics on the ITER research; Views on the dismissal of ITER director Paul-Henri Rebut; Aims of new...

  • Fusion programme `could aid terrorists'. Kramer, David // Nature;6/6/1996, Vol. 381 Issue 6582, p454 

    Criticizes efforts by the United States and Russia aimed at exploring ways of producing fusion energy. Developments in the program; Risk that fusion energy may be used by terrorists; Violations on the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty.

  • Rivals that might oust the tokamak. C.M. // Nature;7/10/1997, Vol. 388 Issue 6638, p118 

    Looks at various national nuclear fusion research programs that are poised to replace the international ITER reactor if it is not eventually built. Descriptions of programs in Japan, Germany, and the United States.

  • Britain set to quit nuclear fusion work.  // Professional Engineering;09/03/97, Vol. 10 Issue 16, p6 

    Reports on Great Britain's plans to withdraw its funding for international research into nuclear fusion. Concerns with technical problems and lack of money; Termination of British workers employed in the project; Implications of the move for Great Britain's plans to build a demonstration fusion...

  • Some confusion over fusion in the US. Kiernan, Vincent // New Scientist;8/27/94, Vol. 143 Issue 1940, p10 

    Reports that the United States Congress approved funding to begin design work on the Tokamak Physics Experiment (TPX) fusion reactor in New Jersey but refused to sanction funding to begin building parts of the machine. Doubts about the government's commitment to fusion; TPX as a step in the...

  • Global fusion plans face three-year delay. Abbott, Alison // Nature;6/19/1997, Vol. 387 Issue 6635, p746 

    States that a decision about whether to build a multibillion dollar international facility to test the feasibility of nuclear fusion as an energy source is almost certain to be delayed because of lack of political enthusiasm. Conclusions by the committee of four partners, which include the...

  • DOE picks design team for the fusion reactor.  // ENR: Engineering News-Record;10/18/93, Vol. 231 Issue 16, p23 

    Reports on the Department of Energy's selection of Ebasco Services Inc. to provide design support for the United States fusion energy program and the participation in the International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor project; Total value of contracts; Members of Ebasco's group; Expenditure on...

  • NUCLEAR ENERGY.  // International Law Update;Jun2001, Vol. 7, p90 

    Reports that the European Union Council and Commission approved an agreement with the United States to improve cooperation and to stimulate joint activities in fusion energy research and development. Basis on an agreement signed in Brussels in November 1995 and March 1996; Provision for...

  • Fusion project `should wait for US results.' Macilwain, Colin // Nature;2/2/1995, Vol. 373 Issue 6513, p375 

    Reports on the comment by US Representative George Brown that the International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor (ITER) should be delayed for between three and five years to allow the United States to find its own fusion experiment called the Tokamak Physics Experiment (TPX). Features of...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics