An impact too far

Dalyell, T.
January 1992
New Scientist;1/25/92, Vol. 133 Issue 1805, p65
Reports on news and information regarding the British Parliament and the sciences. Problems concerning a new road planned to go through the Oxleas Wood; The wildcat was finally added to a list of protected species; Insufficient protection of caves in Great Britain.


Related Articles

  • How federal `guesswork' misleads consumers.  // Consumers' Research Magazine;Jan1995, Vol. 78 Issue 1, p10 

    Presents an excerpt of the report `Choices In Risk Assessment,' sponsored by the United States Department of Energy, which claims that consumers are being misled by science policy disclosures based on assumptions and not on scientific facts. Science policy issues and corresponding default...

  • For Uncle Sam, a revised role in science and technology. Weidenbaum, Murray // Christian Science Monitor;2/20/97, Vol. 89 Issue 59, p15 

    Focuses on the need for the United States (US) government to revise its role in science and technology. Discussion on the environmental policy in the US as it relates to government and the private sector; Establishment of a science policy; Importance of science and technology in the US.

  • Science, scientists and the science budget. Bromley, D. Allan // Issues in Science & Technology;Fall92, Vol. 9 Issue 1, p41 

    Analyzes the difficulty of arriving at a science budget due to its complexity and the multidimensionality of the objectives for research and development support. Different but related objectives of research and development; Academic research in universities and colleges; Roles of scientific and...

  • Getting serious about science-policy reform. Boucher, Rick // Issues in Science & Technology;Winter93/94, Vol. 10 Issue 2, p25 

    Focuses on the need to establish ways to set priorities and to strengthen links between science and broader social concerns. Fundamental change in science and technology policy; Major reforms in the policy; Consolidated research and development (R&D) budget; Need for a permanent science and...

  • The need for a Department of Science. Walker, Robert S. // Issues in Science & Technology;Summer95, Vol. 11 Issue 4, p19 

    Discusses the author's proposal for the creation of a Department of Science in the US. Reasons for the same; Combining the existing science elements of the Departments of Commerce and of Energy; Role of science in making of government decisions; Objection made by the presidential science...

  • Do we need a Department of Science? Gibbons, John H. // Issues in Science & Technology;Summer95, Vol. 11 Issue 4, p22 

    Discusses a proposal for the creation of a US Department of Science. Effect on science and technology (S&T) if they are put under a single banner; Economic diversity of funding sources for S&T; Details of the functioning of S&T; Drawbacks on the creation of a Department of Science; Question of...

  • State support helps French to flourish. Holderness, M. // New Scientist;2/1/92, Vol. 133 Issue 1806, p50 

    Takes a look at how the French government supports the science book and magazine industry in that country. Headaches that government intervention causes; Government will pay for translation of books; French science publishing seems destined to become more cosmopolitan. INSET: Why the book you...

  • And so to bed. Dalyell, T. // New Scientist;2/1/92, Vol. 133 Issue 1806, p58 

    Reports on news and information regarding the British Parliament and the sciences. Prime minister's reasons why he supported the retention of the principle of unanimity by the Council of Ministers when adopting multinational framework programs setting out the European Community's activities in...

  • Committee call.  // New Scientist;5/9/92, Vol. 134 Issue 1820, p11 

    Reports that MPs from all parties want to set up a select committee on science and technology to monitor the government's handling of scientific issues and the work of the newly created Office of Science and Technology. Current arrangement is not satisfactory; The only scrutiny of science...

  • Britain establishes cabinet-level science portfolio.  // Physics Today;Jul92, Vol. 45 Issue 7, p60 

    Reports that England's Prime Minister John Major has given a Cabinet member, John Waldegrave, central responsibility for science and technology policy. Concurrent creation of an Office of Science and Technology under chief scientific adviser William Stewart, who in turn reports to Waldegrave...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics