Nuclear jobs

January 1992
New Scientist;1/4/92, Vol. 133 Issue 1802, p8
Reveals that the number of jobs at America's nuclear weapons factories will be cut in half in the next 15 years. Jobs in managing the department's waste and clean-up will climb; Plans to build a new nuclear reactor to produce tritium for nuclear weapons.


Related Articles

  • Contractors must adapt to survive under new US acquisition policies. Scott, W.B. // Aviation Week & Space Technology;3/20/1989, Vol. 130 Issue 12, p76 

    Talks about the ways defense contractors must adapt their business plans to survive tightening federal budgets and changing Congressional management and procurement policies. Procurement reviews and their focus; Changing business policies; Recent trends.

  • Defense contractors must change to survive competition in 1990s. Dee, W.V. // Aviation Week & Space Technology;7/17/1989, Vol. 131 Issue 3, p99 

    Opinion. Discusses the traditional way defense contractors won business and suggests ways they must change in order to be competitive and survive in the changing market of the 1990s. Examples; Types of competitive structures and staying competitive; Questions managers should ask themselves.

  • Defense diversification plan for LI. LaFemina, Lorraine // Long Island Business News (7/1993 to 5/2009);8/22/94, Vol. 41 Issue 34, p23 

    Reports on the construction of a defense diversification plan for Long Island, New York. Earnings of Northrop Grumman; Benefits of diversification; Assistance provided by the government during the transition; Problems with the cuts in defense spending.

  • Employment effects of the rise and fall in defense spending. Saunders, Norman C. // Monthly Labor Review;Apr93, Vol. 116 Issue 4, p3 

    Discusses cutbacks in defense spending in three areas (Armed Forces, Department of Defense civilian jobs and defense-related private sector jobs) to determine the job cuts that have occurred and are still ahead, and looks at industries and occupations that would be affected by further cutbacks. ...

  • Defense suppliers should review options now. McKee, Bradford // Nation's Business;Feb93, Vol. 81 Issue 2, p8 

    Details other options that smaller Pentagon-dependent defense firms can take with the shrinking of the United States' defense spending. Coloney VanSoosten & Associates consulting firm; Shift to civilian work; Projections on the ratio of defense contractors who will not survive the decade's...

  • Readers' views on defense savings.  // Nation's Business;Feb93, Vol. 81 Issue 2, p69 

    Surveys respondents's views on where savings from defense-cutbacks should be applied. Where I Stand Poll of Nation's Business; Utilization of savings for deficit reduction; Contraction of defense industry; End of Cold War and breakup of Soviet Union; Uncertainty of defense-downsizing schedule;...

  • Allay industry's antitrust concerns.  // Aviation Week & Space Technology;9/27/1993, Vol. 139 Issue 13, p66 

    Editorial. Comments on the economic conditions of the defense industries after the Cold War. Manufacturing capacity which far exceeds marketing demand; Problem of antitrust guidelines which may be impeding the consolidation essential to preserving the defense industrial base; Purpose of the...

  • Measures of financial performance.  // Aviation Week & Space Technology;5/28/1990, Vol. 132 Issue 22, p39 

    Lists measures of financial performance for defense contractors and airlines for 1989, including yearly sales, net income, and S&P bond rating.

  • Contractors restructuring operations to reflect changing defense needs. Smith, B.A. // Aviation Week & Space Technology;5/28/1990, Vol. 132 Issue 22, p62 

    Describes how some defense contractors are restructuring their operations for greater efficiency and diversity in response to changing defense needs. Examples of company reorganizations; New programs; Increased foreign sales.

  • Defense, industry officials differ on steps needed to aid companies. Bond, D.F. // Aviation Week & Space Technology;5/28/1990, Vol. 132 Issue 22, p69 

    Covers the difference of opinion between the Defense Department and the Aerospace Industries Association on what the Pentagon should do to benefit the industry. Profitability concerns; Major opportunities for increasing returns; Program reviews;Growth trends; Acquisition initiatives.


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics