Knowing whether A or B

Aloni, Maria; Égré, Paul; de Jager, Tikitu
September 2013
Synthese;Sep2013, Vol. 190 Issue 13, p2595
Academic Journal
The paper examines the logic and semantics of knowledge attributions of the form “s knows whether A or B”. We analyze these constructions in an epistemic logic with alternative questions, and propose an account of the context-sensitivity of the corresponding sentences and of their presuppositions.


Related Articles

  • Ignorance, Presuppositions, and the Simple View. BLOME-TILLMANN, MICHAEL // Mind;Oct2015, Vol. 124 Issue 496, p1221 

    Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa has presented a series of examples that are meant to spell trouble for Presuppositional Epistemic Contextualism (PEC). In this short article I aim to establish two things. First, I argue that even if Ichikawa's examples were viable counterexamples to PEC, they would not...

  • Sundanese Epistemic Modality "Kudu" A Linguistic Manipulation. Sari, Retno Purwani // International Journal of Linguistics (IJL);2014, Vol. 6 Issue 3, p257 

    The enactment and reproduction of ethnic inequality are argued to be reproduced by linguistic "tools". In this case, the current study is undertaken to investigate Sundanese necessity modal "kudu" ('must'), a particle functioned as a function word, associated with an epistemic interpretation and...

  • Reversibility or Disagreement. ROSS, JACOB; SCHROEDER, MARK // Mind;Jan2013, Vol. 122 Issue 485, p43 

    The phenomenon of disagreement has recently been brought into focus by the debate between contextualists and relativist invariantists about epistemic expressions such as 'might', 'probably', indicative conditionals, and the deontic 'ought'. Against the orthodox contextualist view, it has been...

  • An invariantist theory of 'might' might be right. Braun, David // Linguistics & Philosophy;Nov2012, Vol. 35 Issue 6, p461 

    Invariantism about 'might' says that 'might' semantically expresses the same modal property in every context. This paper presents and defends a version of invariantism. According to it, 'might' semantically expresses the same weak modal property in every context. However, speakers who utter...

  • Standard Contextualism Strikes Back. Yanovich, Igor // Journal of Semantics;Feb2014, Vol. 31 Issue 1, p67 

    Standard contextualism regarding epistemic modality is a family of theories that state that the modal base of an epistemic is determined solely by the context of utterance and the evaluation world. Recently it has been argued that standard contextualism is untenable because it cannot account for...

  • TOWARDS A UNIFIED NOTION OF DISAGREEMENT. BELLERI, Delia; PALMIRA, Michele // Grazer Philosophische Studien;2013, Vol. 88 Issue 1, p139 

    The recent debate on Semantic Contextualism and Relativism has definitely brought the phenomenon of disagreement under the spotlight. Relativists have considered disagreement as a means to accomplish a defence of their own position regarding the semantics of knowledge attributions, epistemic...

  • On nonindexical contextualism. Davis, Wayne // Philosophical Studies;Mar2013, Vol. 163 Issue 2, p561 

    MacFarlane distinguishes 'context sensitivity' from 'indexicality,' and argues that 'nonindexical contextualism' has significant advantages over the standard indexical form. MacFarlane's substantive thesis is that the extension of an expression may depend on an epistemic standard variable even...

  • Pragmatic encroachment, methods and contextualism. Adler, Jonathan E. // Analysis;Jul2012, Vol. 72 Issue 3, p526 

    Defence of conditions to withdraw an assertion that require evidence or epistemic reasons that the assertion is not true or warranted. (Adler, J. 2006. Withdrawal and contextualism. Analysis 66: 280–85) The defence replies to the claim that better methods justify withdrawal without...

  • Relevant possibilities. Smith, Joshua // Philosophical Studies;Mar2008, Vol. 138 Issue 1, p55 

    There are a number of relevant alternatives accounts of knowledge in the literature, including those by contextualists (like Lewis and Cohen), and invariantists (like Dretske). Despite widespread discussion of such views, an explication of the notion of relevance is conspicuously absent from the...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics