TITLE

A Non-factualist defense of the Reflection principle

AUTHOR(S)
Beardman, Stephanie
PUB. DATE
October 2013
SOURCE
Synthese;Oct2013, Vol. 190 Issue 15, p2981
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Are there plausible synchronic constraints on how a subject thinks of herself extended over time? At first glance, Bas van Fraassen’s principle of Reflection seems to prescribe the sort of epistemic authority one’s future self should be taken by one to have over one’s current epistemic states. (The gist of this principle is that I should now believe what I’m convinced I will believe tomorrow.) There has been a general consensus that, as a principle concerning epistemic authority, Reflection does not apply to epistemically non-ideal agents. I agree with this, but argue here that it misses the point of Reflection. Rather than an epistemic principle concerning reasons for belief, Reflection concerns the semantics of belief avowal. I present a non-factual interpretation of Reflection, argue that the principle provides a constraint on the ways in which one can reflectively endorse one’s future epistemic self, and say something about the logic governing such an interpretation.
ACCESSION #
91988865

 

Related Articles

  • Conditionalization, Reflection, and Self-Knowledge. Weisberg, Jonathan // Philosophical Studies;Sep2007, Vol. 135 Issue 2, p179 

    Van Fraassen famously endorses the Principle of Reflection as a constraint on rational credence, and argues that Reflection is entailed by the more traditional principle of Conditionalization. He draws two morals from this alleged entailment. First, that Reflection can be regarded as an...

  • Aimless science. Rowbottom, Darrell // Synthese;Apr2014, Vol. 191 Issue 6, p1211 

    This paper argues that talk of 'the aim of science' should be avoided in the philosophy of science, with special reference to the way that van Fraassen sets up the difference between scientific realism and constructive empiricism. It also argues that talking instead of 'what counts as success in...

  • Mathematical representation: playing a role. Hodesdon, Kate // Philosophical Studies;Apr2014, Vol. 168 Issue 3, p769 

    The primary justification for mathematical structuralism is its capacity to explain two observations about mathematical objects, typically natural numbers. Non-eliminative structuralism attributes these features to the particular ontology of mathematics. I argue that attributing the features to...

  • A DIFFERENT CONCEPTION OF SCIENTIFIC REALISM: THE CASE FOR THE MISSING EXPLANANDA. Derden, James // Journal of Philosophy;May2003, Vol. 100 Issue 5, p243 

    Discusses the mathematical laws, or theories, of empirical science. Bas C. van Fraasen's portrayal of scientific realism; Suggestion that idealized mathematical laws are vacuously true; Counterfactuals or relevance logics; Discussion on how to explicate 'close enough' results for false equations.

  • Bas C. van Fraassen, The Empirical Stance. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2002. Bueno, Otávio // Metascience;Nov2003, Vol. 12 Issue 3, p360 

    No abstract available.

  • Users, Structures, and Representation. Frisch, Mathias // British Journal for the Philosophy of Science;Jun2015, Vol. 66 Issue 2, p285 

    This article defends a pragmatic and structuralist account of scientific representation of the kind recently proposed by Bas van Fraassen against criticisms of both the structuralist and the pragmatist plank of the account. I argue that the account appears to have the unacceptable consequence...

  • Scientific Representation: Paradoxes of Perspective. Lamoureux, Lucien // Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review;Sep2009, Vol. 48 Issue 3, p691 

    The article reviews the book "Scientific Representation: Paradoxes of Perspective," by Bas C. van Fraassen.

  • Perilous thoughts: comment on van Fraassen. Longino, Helen // Philosophical Studies;Mar2009, Vol. 143 Issue 1, p25 

    Bas van Fraassen�s empiricist reading of Perrin�s achievement invites the question: whose doubts about atoms did Perrin put to rest? This comment recontextualizes the argument and applies the notion of empirical grounding to some contemporary work in behavioral biology.

  • The Empirical Stance (Book). Shaw, Elizabeth C.; O'Grady, Paul // Review of Metaphysics;Jun2004, Vol. 57 Issue 4, p870 

    Reviews the book "The Empirical Stance," by Bas C. van Fraassen.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics