TITLE

Criteria for logical formalization

AUTHOR(S)
Peregrin, Jaroslav; Svoboda, Vladimír
PUB. DATE
September 2013
SOURCE
Synthese;Sep2013, Vol. 190 Issue 13, p2897
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article addresses two closely related questions: What are the criteria of adequacy of logical formalization of natural language arguments, and what gives logic the authority to decide which arguments are good and which are bad? Our point of departure is the criticism of the conception of logical formalization put forth, in a recent paper, by M. Baumgartner and T. Lampert. We argue that their account of formalization as a kind of semantic analysis brings about more problems than it solves. We also argue that the criteria of adequate formalization need not be based on truth conditions associated with logical formulas; in our view, they are better based on structural (inferential) grounds. We then put forward our own version of the criteria. The upshot of the discussion that follows is that the quest for an adequate formalization in a suitable logical language is best conceived of as the search for a Goodmanian reflective equilibrium.
ACCESSION #
91988583

 

Related Articles

  • Informal pragmatics and linguistic creativity. Collier, John // South African Journal of Philosophy;2014, Vol. 33 Issue 2, p121 

    Examples of successful linguistic communication give rise to two important insights: (1) it should be understood most fundamentally in terms of the pragmatic success of each individual utterance, and (2) linguistic conventions need to be understood as on a par with the non-linguistic...

  • Is Existence a Predicate? Beshkova, Anna // Philosophical Alternatives Journal / Filosofski Alternativi;2011, Vol. 20 Issue 6, p99 

    The main topic of the paper is the interpretation of the problem 'is existence a predicate'. First part of the paper is concerned especially with the explanation of classical questions originating from accepting of subject-predicative logical form and connecting with it wrong explanation of...

  • Formalization in philosophical logic. Jacquette, Dale // Monist;Jul94, Vol. 77 Issue 3, p358 

    Discusses the proper uses of formalization in philosophical logic. Uses of logic for expression of formal structures of thought and an inference mechanism; Need for pragmatic selectivity in the application of formalization to the development of particular formal systems; Inapplicability of...

  • OXFORD AND THE 'EPIDEMIC' OF ORDINARY LANGUAGE PHILOSOPHY. Forguson, Lynd // Monist;Jul2001, Vol. 84 Issue 3, p325 

    Discusses whether ordinary language philosophy, known as the Oxford philosophy, is a philosophical movement. British Philosophical Establishment on the eve of World War II; Impact of ordinary language philosophy at Oxford University in England; Oxford philosophers in the job market; Epidemic of...

  • Formalism, logic and reality: a Keynesian analysis. Chick, Victoria; Dow, Sheila C. // Cambridge Journal of Economics;Nov2001, Vol. 25 Issue 6, p705 

    Focuses on the argument that formalism is non-neutral. Need for provisional closure; Analysis on the open systems; Complexity of an economic system.

  • Can we understand each other after all? Eby, Lloyd // World & I;Jul97, Vol. 12 Issue 7, p322 

    Focuses on the interpretation theory that people who come from or represent significantly different mind-sets or language communities cannot really communicate with one another. Key points of arguments of Thomas Kuhn concerning this issue; Examination of Morton Kaplan's explanation of this theory.

  • Tired? Sluggish? CARTER, BOB // Legacy (National Association for Interpretation);Jan/Feb2016, Vol. 27 Issue 1, p18 

    A personal narrative is presented which explores the author's experience of conducting a workshop on interpretation in Springfield, Illinois in September 2015.

  • The normativity of meaning defended. Whiting, Daniel // Analysis;Apr2007, Vol. 67 Issue 294, p133 

    The article presents the author's refutation of objections to the normativity thesis by examining "meaning" as an intrinsically normative notion. Normative statements are seen as action-guiding, telling us what to do but also what may or may not be done. The author seems to dispute the notion of...

  • Some closing comments. Van Atten, Mark // Erwägen Wissen Ethik;2008, Vol. 19 Issue 4, p599 

    The article presents three comments on critiques presented to the work of Christoph Sigwart on the concept of number in an excerpt from his book "Logic" in this issue. The author stresses the importance of keeping a combined pair of things distinct in logical reasoning. He also argues that logic...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics