TITLE

Russia, S. Korea welcome deal on Syrian chemical weapons destruction - statement

AUTHOR(S)
Interfax
PUB. DATE
November 2013
SOURCE
Russia & FSU General News;11/13/2013, p1
SOURCE TYPE
Newswire
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
SEOUL. Nov 13 (Interfax) - Russia and South Korea welcome Syria's decision to join the Chemical Weapons Convention and the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) and highly value the Russian-U.S. framework agreements on the disposal of chemical weapons in Syria, says a statement the two countries signed following South Korean-Russian top level negotiations in Seoul on Wednesday.
ACCESSION #
91962866

 

Related Articles

  • Chemical weapons.  // Congressional Digest;Jun/Jul97, Vol. 76 Issue 6/7, p162 

    Reports that the Convention on the Prohibition of the Development, Production, Stockpiling and Use of Chemical Weapons and on their Destruction became effective on April 29, 1997. How the convention is known as the Chemical Weapons Convention (CWC); How the CWC treaty has been signed by 165...

  • Senate ready to vote on weapons treaty.  // Chemical Market Reporter;03/31/97, Vol. 251 Issue 13, p6 

    Reports on the US Senate's plans to debate and vote on an international treaty banning the production and use of chemical weapons. Comments from Senate Majority Leader Trent Lott on the treaty; Position of the chemical industry on the treaty; Opposition against the accord.

  • Chemical weapons banned.  // Current Science;4/23/93, Vol. 78 Issue 17, p13 

    Discusses how representatives from more than 120 nations met in Paris, France and signed an agreement to ban the use of chemicals weapons. The need to destroy the chemical weapons in existence within ten years; Deadly effects of chemical weapons; Inspection system set up for compliance; More.

  • Conventional wait. Smithson, Amy E. // Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists;Sep1993, Vol. 49 Issue 7, p10 

    Argues that US and Russian officials are engaged in an increasingly awkward game of cat-and-mouse concerning the destruction of chemical weapons. Bilateral accords that ignited multilateral Chemical Weapons Convention; Phases of the 1989 memorandum of understanding; Verifying bilateral...

  • Death rattle of poison gas. Satchell, Michael // U.S. News & World Report;9/13/93, Vol. 115 Issue 10, p54 

    Reports that the United States and Russia have pledged to destroy their chemical arsenals by the years 2004. Army's choice to incinerate weapons and build incinerators at the eight US locations where the munitions are stored; How environmental activists are fighting the plan because of concern...

  • Army taking a close look at alternative technologies. Wright, Andrew G.; Powers, Mary Buckner // ENR: Engineering News-Record;4/08/96, Vol. 236 Issue 14, p22 

    Presents information on what the U.S. Army is preparing its Tooele for. Cost of the Tooele; What is being done by the U.S. Army; What is believed by the Army; Where the incinerators were scheduled to be built; What the Army agreed to; What the conducted tests achieved; Cautioned by an Army...

  • Are we ready for chemical warfare? Berson, Tom // Insight on the News;09/22/97, Vol. 13 Issue 35, p22 

    Provides information on the destruction that can be caused by chemical weapons looking at the attack by the Aum Shinrikyo cult that took place in a Tokyo sub-way in Japan. Comments from Harvard chemistry professor Matthew Meselson; Why the United States is predicting one of these attacks.

  • Yes: The treaty will reduce the chemical-weapons threat and protect the U.S. chemical industry. Smithson, Amy E. // Insight on the News;03/17/97, Vol. 13 Issue 10, p26 

    Points out the importance of ratifying the chemical weapons ban treaty. Reduction of chemical weapons threat from abroad; Unpredictability and danger in the storage of chemical weapons; Development of improved chemical detectors; Useful tool to address proliferation problems.

  • No: The treaty trades U.S. civil liberties and national security for illusory benefits. Gaffney Jr., Frank // Insight on the News;03/17/97, Vol. 13 Issue 10, p27 

    Refutes the need to ratify the arms control agreement that bans the use of chemical weapons. Ease in manufacturing chemical weapons; Indication of some countries not to be involved in chemical arms control; Spread of military-relevant chemical technology.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics