How Do Auditors Weight Informal Contrary Advice? The Joint Influence of Advisor Social Bond and Advice Justifiability

Kadous, Kathryn; Leiby, Justin; Peecher, Mark E.
November 2013
Accounting Review;Nov2013, Vol. 88 Issue 6, p2061
Academic Journal
Auditors frequently seek informal advice from peers to improve judgment quality, but the conditions under which advice improves auditor judgment are poorly understood. We predict and find evidence of a trust heuristic among auditors receiving advice from advisors with whom they share a social bond. This heuristic is evident among non-specialists, who weight advice according to its justifiability when it is received from a weaker social bond advisor, but fail to objectively assess the quality of advice received and weight it heavily when it comes from a stronger social bond advisor, regardless of its justifiability. Specialists, while less prone to the trust heuristic in advice weighting, show inconsistencies in advice weighting and their assessments of advice quality. In particular, specialists discount better justified advice from stronger social bond advisors, despite rating this advice as being of relatively high quality. This defensiveness likely arises from an aversive social comparison process attributable to the high egorelevance of a task within one's specialization. Future research is warranted to corroborate or refute this possibility.


Related Articles

  • The Strength of an Accounting Firm’s Ethical Environment and the Quality of Auditors’ Judgments. Martinov-Bennie, Nonna; Pflugrath, Gary // Journal of Business Ethics;Jun2009, Vol. 87 Issue 2, p237 

    This study examines the impact of the strength of an accounting firm's ethical environment (presence and reinforcement vis-à-vis the presence of a code of conduct) on the quality of auditor judgment, across different levels of audit expertise. Using a 2 × 2 full factorial 'between...

  • The Pricing of National and City-Specific Reputations for Industry Expertise in the U.S. Audit Market. Francis, Jere R.; Reichelt, Kenneth; Wang, Dechun // Accounting Review;Jan2005, Vol. 80 Issue 1, p113 

    The pricing of Big 5 industry leadership in the U.S. audit market is investigated using audit fee disclosures for the 2000-2001 fiscal years and the joint national-city framework in Ferguson et al. (2003). There is a significant fee premium of 19 percent on those engagements where Big 5 auditors...

  • Auditor Industry Specialization, Client Bargaining Power, and Audit Pricing. Casterella, Jeffrey R.; Francis, Jere R.; Lewis, Barry L.; Walker, Paul L. // Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory;Mar2004, Vol. 23 Issue 1, p123 

    Porter's (1985) analysis of competitive strategy is used to explain industry specialization by Big 6 accounting firms. In Porter's framework, industry specialization can be viewed as a differentiation strategy whose purpose is to create a sustainable competitive advantage relative to...

  • Experimental Evidence on the Effects of Accountability on Auditor Judgments. Johnson, Van E.; Kaplan, Steven E. // Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory;1991 Supplement, Vol. 10, p96 

    This study examines the effect of accountability on auditor judgment. Professional auditors completed an inventory task in which they assessed the risk of obsolescence for 20 inventory items. The auditors were assigned to one of two groups. Auditors in the accountable group were told that their...

  • Bank reports for audit purposes. Blackwood, Michael // Accountancy;Oct76, Vol. 87 Issue 998, p47 

    This article looks at a Statement of Auditing wherein auditors in Great Britain are recommended to use a standard letter of request when writing to clearings banks for audit confirmations in 1976. In March 1974, the Auditing Practices Committee of the English Institute set up a subcommittee to...

  • CONSULTING? MORE LIKE COMPLIANCE. Beattie, Vivien; Brandt, Richard; Fearnley, Stella // Accountancy;Nov96, Vol. 118 Issue 1239, p95 

    The article focuses on the debate concerning the non-audit services provided by auditors to their clients in Great Britain. Audit firms are frequently being criticized for their provision of non-audit services. Critics claim that non-audit services affect the integrity of audit. However, there...

  • FAR TOO MANY AUDITS NEED IMPROVEMENT, WATCHDOG SAYS.  // Accountancy;Aug2010, Vol. 146 Issue 1404, p5 

    The article reports on audit inspectors' call on auditors in Great Britain to change their behavior if they are to seriously challenge their clients' judgments. The British Audit Inspection Unit (AIU) made the call in its review of audit firm inspections in the country. A report from the AIU...

  • Should Congress Mandate Audit Firm Rotation? Dickins, Denise // Regulation;Winter2006, Vol. 29 Issue 4, p6 

    The article examines the need for the U.S. Congress to mandate audit firm rotation. It was commonly believed that it was economical for firms to retain the same auditors year after year rather than periodically change auditors to get a different perspective on their books, prior to the...

  • Employment with audit client.  // Practical Accountant;Oct99, Vol. 32 Issue 10, p12 

    Reports on the Independence Standards Board's plan to develop an exposure draft for its proposed standard on auditor independence in the United States. Requirement of auditing firms' development and implementation of internal monitoring mechanisms on clients' employment of partners or...

  • Self-Selection of Auditors and Audit Pricing in Private Firms. Chaney, Paul K.; Jeter, Debra; Shivakumar, Lakshmanan // Accounting Review;Jan2004, Vol. 79 Issue 1, p51 

    Prior research has examined audit pricing for publicly held firms and provided some evidence of a Big 8 premium in pricing. We investigate audit pricing among private firms, and provide evidence that private firms do not pay such a premium on average. The relatively greater degree of dispersion...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics