TITLE

The Odd State of Twiqbal Plausibility in Pleading Affirmative Defenses

AUTHOR(S)
Janssen, William M.
PUB. DATE
June 2013
SOURCE
Washington & Lee Law Review;Summer2013, Vol. 70 Issue 3, p1573
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
No abstract available.
ACCESSION #
91959712

 

Related Articles

  • Do Twombly and Iqbal Apply to Affirmative Defenses? Machado, Leslie Paul; Haynes, C. Matthew // Federal Lawyer;Jul2012, Vol. 59 Issue 6, p56 

    The article presents information on the application of affirmative defenses in case of pleading with reference to the U.S. Supreme Court decisions in case of Ashcroft v. Iqbal and Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly. The splits among the courts, the importance of fairness and litigation efficiency...

  • The Factual Plausibility Standard For Assessing the Sufficiency Of A Complaint In The Twombley-IqbalEra. Baber, Brett D. // Maine Bar Journal;Fall2011, Vol. 26 Issue 4, p189 

    The article presents information on the factual plausibility standards enacted by the U.S. Supreme Court, according to which a complaint must survive a motion to dismiss. It further discusses several cases related to these issues including Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombley and Ashcroft v. Iqbal....

  • KEEP CALM AND PLEAD ON: WHY NEW EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE SHOULD TEMPER FEARS ABOUT PLEADING PLAUSIBILITY. Silagi, Alex D. // Seton Hall Law Review;2014, Vol. 44 Issue 1, p247 

    The article focuses on the state of pleading in the U.S. with reference to the Supreme Court decisions in the cases including Bell Atlantic v. Twombly and Ashcroft v. Iqbal. Topics discussed include summary of the cases, change in the standard announced by the court for sufficient pleading under...

  • Election Law Pleading. Douglas, Joshua A. // George Washington Law Review;Nov2013, Vol. 81 Issue 6, p1966 

    This Article provides the first comprehensive look at pleadings in election law cases after the Supreme Court's jurisprudential shift for pleading in Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly and Ashcroft v. Iqbal. In those cases, the Supreme Court declared that plaintiffs must meet a "factual...

  • Do Twombly and Iqbal Apply to Affirmative Defenses? Walworth, Carla R.; Wetzler, Mor; Oliva, Jessica // Pretrial Practice & Discovery;Spring2012, Vol. 20 Issue 3, p8 

    The article explores the applicability of the pleading standard established in the decisions made in Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly and Ashcroft v. Iqbal to affirmative defenses. The standard under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8 was revised in 2007 with the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in...

  • SUPREME COURT RAISES the PLEADINGS BAR AGAIN. Motzenbecker, Douglas E. // Litigation News;Winter2010, Vol. 35 Issue 2, p10 

    The article presents information on the U.S. Supreme Court's decisions in lawsuits, Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, and Ashcroft v. Iqbal. It has recently expanded its ruling on the first one, holding that Twombly's plausibility standard applies with equal force to all civil actions. It is...

  • THE NEW RULE 12(B)(6): TWOMBLY, IQBAL, AND THE PARADOX OF PLEADING. Kilaru, Rakesh N. // Stanford Law Review;Mar2010, Vol. 62 Issue 3, p905 

    The author comments on Rule 12(b)(6) of the U.S. Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and pleading in U.S. Supreme Court cases Bell Atlantic versus Twombly and Ashcroft versus Iqbal. He discusses the types and process of plausibility in both cases. He outlines the effects of the cases on pleading...

  • PLEADING WITH CONGRESS TO RESIST THE URGE TO OVERRULE TWOMBLY AND IQBAL. Huston, Michael R. // Michigan Law Review;Dec2010, Vol. 109 Issue 3, p415 

    In Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly and Ashcroft v. Iqbal, the Supreme Court changed the rhetoric of the federal pleading system. Those decisions have been decried by members of the bar, scholars, and legislators as judicial activism and a rewriting of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Such...

  • AN IMPLAUSIBLE STANDARD FOR AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES. Mayer, Stephen // Michigan Law Review;Nov2013, Vol. 112 Issue 2, p275 

    In the wake of Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly and Ashcroft v. Iqbal, the federal district courts split over whether to apply Twombly's plausibility standard to the pleading of affirmative defenses. Initially, a majority of district courts extended Twombly to defense pleadings, but recently the...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics