TITLE

The importance of health co-benefits in macroeconomic assessments of UK Greenhouse Gas emission reduction strategies

AUTHOR(S)
Jensen, Henning Tarp; Keogh-Brown, Marcus R.; Smith, Richard D.; Chalabi, Zaid; Dangour, Alan D.; Davies, Mike; Edwards, Phil; Garnett, Tara; Givoni, Moshe; Griffiths, Ulla; Hamilton, Ian; Jarrett, James; Roberts, Ian; Wilkinson, Paul; Woodcock, James; Haines, Andy
PUB. DATE
November 2013
SOURCE
Climatic Change;Nov2013, Vol. 121 Issue 2, p223
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
We employ a single-country dynamically-recursive Computable General Equilibrium model to make health-focussed macroeconomic assessments of three contingent UK Greenhouse Gas (GHG) mitigation strategies, designed to achieve 2030 emission targets as suggested by the UK Committee on Climate Change. In contrast to previous assessment studies, our main focus is on health co-benefits additional to those from reduced local air pollution. We employ a conservative cost-effectiveness methodology with a zero net cost threshold. Our urban transport strategy (with cleaner vehicles and increased active travel) brings important health co-benefits and is likely to be strongly cost-effective; our food and agriculture strategy (based on abatement technologies and reduction in livestock production) brings worthwhile health co-benefits, but is unlikely to eliminate net costs unless new technological measures are included; our household energy efficiency strategy is likely to breakeven only over the long term after the investment programme has ceased (beyond our 20 year time horizon). We conclude that UK policy makers will, most likely, have to adopt elements which involve initial net societal costs in order to achieve future emission targets and longer-term benefits from GHG reduction. Cost-effectiveness of GHG strategies is likely to require technological mitigation interventions and/or demand-constraining interventions with important health co-benefits and other efficiency-enhancing policies that promote internalization of externalities. Health co-benefits can play a crucial role in bringing down net costs, but our results also suggest the need for adopting holistic assessment methodologies which give proper consideration to welfare-improving health co-benefits with potentially negative economic repercussions (such as increased longevity).
ACCESSION #
91907537

 

Related Articles

  • CLIMATE CHANGE -- EUROPEAN AND NATIONAL POLICIES AND ACTIONS. PLATON, Victor; CONSTANTINESCU, Andreea // Quality - Access to Success;2013 Supplement, p27 

    Since 1972, the year of establishment of Community environmental policy, EU is widely recognized as one of the promoters of the fight against climate change. Therefore, a comparative analysis between the National Strategy on Climate Change and the European Union Strategy in the field was...

  • Tokyo target.  // Green Futures;Jul2008, Issue 69, p4 

    The article reports on Japan's plan to reduce its production of greenhouse gas emissions by 60%-80% by 2050. The initiative is part of the country's participation in the global environmental scheme after seeing the successful move of Great Britain. Japan Prime Minister Yasuo Fukuda announced a...

  • Time, money and tradeoffs. Bradford, David F. // Nature;4/5/2001, Vol. 410 Issue 6829, p649 

    Discusses a study in the April 5, 2001 issue of 'Nature' magazine which brings economics into consideration in prescribing limits on greenhouse gas emissions by use of a model that integrates physical and economic systems. Focus on tradeoffs, the principle that a nation can emit more of one gas...

  • Global Environmental Concepts.  // Central African Republic Country Review;2010, p110 

    The article provides information on the global environmental conditions with regards to global warming and greenhouse gases as well as international policy to prevent the adverse effect of global warming.

  • Low-yield stavings.  // Waste News;2/17/2003, Vol. 8 Issue 23, p8 

    Editorial. Focuses on the environmental policy adopted by the U.S. government. Agreements with 12 greenhouse-gas-generating industries; Need for various sectors of economy to contribute in reducing greenhouse gas emissions.

  • Preface. Yatchew, Adonis // Energy Journal;Multi-Greenhouse Gas Mitigation, Vol. 27, pvii 

    The article discusses various reports published within the issue, including one on climate policy and multi-greenhouse gas mitigation.

  • State Attorneys General v. Everyone. Heslin, Kevin // Energy User News;Sep2002, Vol. 27 Issue 9, p8 

    Editorial. Comments on the initiative of state attorney generals urging U.S. President George W. Bush to reconsider climate change policies. Failure of the administration to mandate reductions of greenhouse gas emissions; Necessity of lessening the regulatory certainty; Awareness on the...

  • Enforcement of Kyoto delayed.  // Modern Power Systems;Feb2002, Vol. 22 Issue 2, p9 

    Reports the delay in the enforcement of mandatory greenhouse gas emission reductions to the industries in Japan.

  • Some of Us Can Afford It, Others Can't. Baer, Paul // Environmental Forum;May/Jun2008, Vol. 25 Issue 3, p52 

    The author discusses the annual cost of keeping global greenhouse concentrations to a level that likely avoids catastrophic impacts. He says that three to five percent of gross world product (GWP) are needed to keep the concentration to 445 parts per million carbon dioxide. The loss of...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics