TITLE

Understanding the funding cost differences between global systemically important banks (GSIBs) and non-G-SIBs in the USA

AUTHOR(S)
Araten, Michel; Turner, Christopher
PUB. DATE
October 2013
SOURCE
Journal of Risk Management in Financial Institutions;Autumn2013, Vol. 6 Issue 4, p387
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
This paper seeks to determine the sources and the extent of funding cost differences between global systemically important banks (G-SIBs) and non- G-SIBs in the USA. It builds on earlier studies that have asserted that G-SIBs have had lower funding costs, which has been attributed to an assumed toobig- to-fail status. Most of the previous studies, however, failed to control for macro-economic factors and firm-specific credit risk and ignored funding costs at the bank holding company level. This paper contributes to the literature by examining the various sources of funding for a variety of US bank holding companies through the recent full credit cycle, 2002-2011, controlling for firmspecific credit and macro-economic factors. It also introduces an analysis of systemic risk and determines the extent to which this might mask the funding costs benefits. An evaluation is made of the impact on funding costs of explicit support built into some issuers' credit ratings. It was found that there are moderate cost advantages associated with G-SIB status with regard to domestic deposits and smaller cost advantages with respect to credit spreads on senior, unsecured debt. Overall, the impact on funding costs taking into account all funding sources over the full credit cycle is a reduction of 9 basis points (bps). Considering just the interest-bearing funding sources to which one might attribute government support, the weighted average cost of funds associated with G-SIB status is about 18 bps lower than for non-G-SIBs. When evaluating the impact of firm size on credit default swap (CDS) spreads in other industries, it was found that there are significant spread advantages for larger firms in most industries
ACCESSION #
91895980

 

Related Articles

  • Annuity Fee Income Jumps. Correia, Margarida // American Banker;4/23/2012, Vol. 177 Issue 62, p4 

    The article presents information about U.S. banks and bank holding companies' annuity fee income which totaled $2.84 from the sale of annuities in 2011.

  • Fed Requires Big-Bank Capital Plans.  // Pratt's Letter;11/28/2011, p4 

    The article reports that the Federal Reserve Board has issued a final ruling for top-tier U.S. banks with total consolidated assets of more than 50 billion dollars to submit yearly capital plans for review. The Board's rule complies to the Dodd-Frank Act to conduct an annual stress tests on all...

  • Tougher Leverage Ratio Will Force $200B Capital Raise. Rehm, Barbara A. // American Banker;9/24/2013, Vol. 178 Issue 147, p25 

    The article discusses Clearing House Association's study which found that in order for 12 large banking companies to comply with U.S. and Basel III capital rules as of September 24, 2013, they will need to raise $202 billion in Tier 1 capital or reduce their assets by $3.7 trillion. The proposed...

  • FDIC Quarterly.  // FDIC Summary of Deposits Survey;2011, Vol. 5 Issue 1, preceding p1 

    The article presents the summary of financial results for American banking industry for the fourth quarter of 2010, which is published by Division of Insurance and Research of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC). It includes analysis of banking and economic trends at national and...

  • Trading Revenue Fell by Half. Hopkins, Cheyenne // American Banker;9/28/2009, Vol. 174 Issue 179, p12 

    The article reports that the U.S. Office of the Comptroller of the Currency stated that banks declared overall revenue of $5.2 billion from securities trading in the second quarter of 2009. This was a decline from the record $9.8 billion in trading revenue reported in the first quarter. The...

  • Bank Trading Revenue Falls in 4Q As Demand Slows: OCC. Todd, Sarah // American Banker;3/31/2014, Vol. 178 Issue 48, p10 

    The article notes information from the U.S. Office of the Comptroller of the Currency's (OCC's) report which found that credit risk and trading revenue at banks and thrifts in fourth-quarter 2013 declined. The article notes OCC official Kurt Wilhelm's remarks in a March 28, 2014 press release...

  • Value of latent risk and decision to hedge. Acharya, Sankarshan; Francis, William // Banks & Bank Systems;2007, Vol. 2 Issue 4, p66 

    We present a novel approach to measure the systematic effect of latent information-based endogenous choices of firms and apply it to estimate the impact of bank holding companies' (BHCs') derivative trading decisions on their risk. To reduce the risk, a BHC can either restrict lending or hedge...

  • Banks, Risk, and FAS105 Disclosures. McAnally, Mary Léa // Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance;Summer96, Vol. 11 Issue 3, p453 

    This study examines whether Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 105 (FAS105) footnote disclosures of off-balance-sheet financial instruments and derivatives provide risk-relevant information in addition to that provided by the balance sheet alone. A theoretical model relates market...

  • Idle Cash at Big 3 Nearly Equals Corporate Loans.  // American Banker;2/17/2010, Vol. 175 Issue 25, p16 

    The article focuses on the cash and deposits accumulated by U.S. banks Citigroup, JPMorgan Chase, and Bank of America.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics