Understanding the funding cost differences between global systemically important banks (GSIBs) and non-G-SIBs in the USA

Araten, Michel; Turner, Christopher
October 2013
Journal of Risk Management in Financial Institutions;Autumn2013, Vol. 6 Issue 4, p387
Academic Journal
This paper seeks to determine the sources and the extent of funding cost differences between global systemically important banks (G-SIBs) and non- G-SIBs in the USA. It builds on earlier studies that have asserted that G-SIBs have had lower funding costs, which has been attributed to an assumed toobig- to-fail status. Most of the previous studies, however, failed to control for macro-economic factors and firm-specific credit risk and ignored funding costs at the bank holding company level. This paper contributes to the literature by examining the various sources of funding for a variety of US bank holding companies through the recent full credit cycle, 2002-2011, controlling for firmspecific credit and macro-economic factors. It also introduces an analysis of systemic risk and determines the extent to which this might mask the funding costs benefits. An evaluation is made of the impact on funding costs of explicit support built into some issuers' credit ratings. It was found that there are moderate cost advantages associated with G-SIB status with regard to domestic deposits and smaller cost advantages with respect to credit spreads on senior, unsecured debt. Overall, the impact on funding costs taking into account all funding sources over the full credit cycle is a reduction of 9 basis points (bps). Considering just the interest-bearing funding sources to which one might attribute government support, the weighted average cost of funds associated with G-SIB status is about 18 bps lower than for non-G-SIBs. When evaluating the impact of firm size on credit default swap (CDS) spreads in other industries, it was found that there are significant spread advantages for larger firms in most industries


Related Articles

  • Banks Can No Longer Leave Policy Risks to Chance. Petrou, Karen Shaw // American Banker;9/23/2013, Vol. 178 Issue 146, p14 

    The author discusses a requirement from the U.S. Federal Reserve (Fed) that beginning in 2014 large bank holding companies have plans for addressing credit, reputational, strategic, and compliance risk. In her view the requirements are sensible, and even smaller banks not subject to them need to...

  • Bank-Holding Company Act--The De Novo Doctrine, The Anti-Tie-In Provisions, and other Antitrust.... Baker, Donald I.; Blaine, Charles G.; Tuttle, Baldwin B.; Simmon, Richard S. // Business Lawyer;Nov73, Vol. 29 Issue 1, p237 

    Focuses on the anti-tie-in provision and antitrust implication of the 1970 Bank Holding Company Act. Reduction of barriers between commercial banking and other financial services; Doctrine of potential competition as applied to combinations between bank in different markets; Standard feature of...

  • BANKS AND BANKING. Becker, Deborah A. // Business Lawyer;Nov85, Vol. 41 Issue 1, p307 

    Presents the article 'The Demise of the Bank/Nonbank Distinction: Argument for Deregulating the Activities of Bank Holding Companies'.

  • Are holding companies really riskier than banks? Dunaief, Daniel // American Banker;9/14/1995, Vol. 160 Issue 177, p28 

    Focuses on the issue on whether bank holding companies are weaker than their banks that has become a debate among fixed-income analysts. Five-basis-point difference between two classes of debt according to Ethan M. Heisler, analyst at Salomon Brothers Inc.; Event risk meaning greater exposure...

  • Leading banks and bank-holding companies. Lessard, Raelyn // Crain's Detroit Business;05/24/99, Vol. 15 Issue 21, p10 

    Lists the leading banks and bank-holding companies in the five-county area of Wayne, Oakland, Macomb, Washtenaw and Livingston in Michigan, ranked by 1998 assets. Includes Comerica Inc.; Banc One, Michigan; Michigan National Corp.; National City Bank of Michigan/Illinois; Citizens Banking Corp.

  • Bank Holding Companies with the Most Employees.  // American Banker;12/24/2003, Vol. 168 Issue 246, p8 

    The article presents a chart, ranking bank holding companies with the most employees in the U.S. on June 30, 2003.

  • Most Efficient Bank Holding Companies.  // American Banker;5/12/2009, Vol. 174 Issue 90, p10 

    The article offers a list of the most efficient bank holding companies including Broadway Bancorp Inc., SBC Inc., and Prosperity Bancshares Inc.

  • Banking's Top Performers. Surer, Mark // ABA Journal;Jun99, Vol. 85 Issue 6, p36 

    Presents a list of the top 100 banks and bank holding companies in the United States with assets over one-billion dollars. How the rankings were prepared; Efforts of banks to boost noninterest income; How some top-performing institutions have successfully adapted their business to take...

  • Most Efficient U.S. Bank Holding Companies Among the Largest 500.  // American Banker;9/5/2002, Vol. 167 Issue 170, p13 

    Lists the most efficient bank holding companies in the U.S. in the first quarter of 2002. New Jersey-based Hudson City MHC Paramus; Hershenhorn Bancorp Palatine of Illinois; MBT Financial Corp. of Monroe, Michigan; Warsaw, New York-based Financial Institutions Inc.


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics