TITLE

What a Difference a Court Makes

AUTHOR(S)
Reitz, Diana B.
PUB. DATE
November 2013
SOURCE
Claims;Nov2013, Vol. 61 Issue 11, p16
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article examines the roles of courts in the settlement of insurance policy claims. According to the author, courts review the arguments for and against coverage, consider the wording of policy forms, and review past reasoning in order to find out the meanings of the words. The author discusses the decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit which involved a woman named Barbara Bennett who sued State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company after being hit by a car.
ACCESSION #
91691504

 

Related Articles

  • Insurers' Duty to Investigate. D.A.O. // California Law Review;Jan70 part 2, Vol. 58 Issue 1, p274 

    Discusses the California Supreme Court case 'Barrera v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.' involving insurance. Complaint and cross complaint; Trial court decision; Insurers' extra-contractual duty to investigate and act promptly on an application.

  • UNINSURED MOTORIST--COLORADO--PUBLIC POLICY--COMMON LAW.  // Arbitration Journal;Sep77, Vol. 32 Issue 3, p238 

    The article focuses on the court case Wales v. State Farm Mutual Auto Insurance Co. The court held that the arbitration and consent to sue clauses of the policy were not void as being against public policy. The plaintiff was involved in an automobile collision with an uninsured motorist. Despite...

  • High-School Hazing Incites Insurance Battle. Nicholas, Adele // Corporate Legal Times;Sep2004, Vol. 14 Issue 154, p78 

    Reports on lawsuit filed by the State Farm Insurance Cos. against claims relating to hazing incident in Chicago. Coverage of the policy; Denial of the company to pay any claims resulting from the girls' participation in hazing; Arguments presented by the families of the students regarding the...

  • Non-Party Settlement Offsets UM Coverage.  // Insurance Advocate;4/24/2006, Vol. 117 Issue 9, p12 

    The article discusses the ruling of the New York Supreme Court in "State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Gutkin." The court granted State Farm's motion to vacate an award and remanded the case back to the arbitrator to consider the $25,000 prior settlement with the non-party. The...

  • Insurers gain from ruling. Guyette, James E. // Automotive Body Repair News;Oct2005, Vol. 44 Issue 10, p1 

    Reports that Illinois Supreme Court justices have declared that using aftermarket parts did not breach the insurer's contract with its policyholders in Avery v. State Farm Insurance Cos. Expectation for insurance company vehicle damage estimates to call for more widespread use of aftermarket...

  • Township not Responsible for Store Employee's Death. Gold, Lessing E. // SDM: Security Distributing & Marketing;Jun2006, Vol. 36 Issue 6, p46 

    The article discusses the decision of the U.S. Court of Appeals involving a case in Michigan regarding the immunity of police officers to a complaint which is based on violation of due process. The court held that a township is not liable without constitutional violation. It cited two exceptions...

  • Transfer to More Demanding Job is Not an Adverse Job Action. Littrell, Amy W. // Venulex Legal Summaries;2002 Q4, p1 

    This article focuses on a ruling by the U.S. Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals on the court case, White v. Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co., stating that a transfer to a more demanding job is not an adverse job action. Facts of the case are presented. The court also held that the...

  • Court Affirms Denial of Disability Benefits.  // Benefits Magazine;May2014, Vol. 51 Issue 5, p53 

    The article reports that the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit upholds a disability benefits determination under the arbitrary and capricious standard of review. The plaintiff pursued administrative appeals of the decision and the claims administrator and the defendant plan...

  • Court Awards Preliminary Injunction to Halt Retiree Benefit Changes.  // Benefits Magazine;May2014, Vol. 51 Issue 5, p62 

    The article reports that the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit has affirmed that the district court's award of preliminary injunctive relief related to the changes to retirees' health care benefits. The court notes that it need to review the district court's grant of a preliminary...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics