TITLE

Team decision making in the workplace: A systematic review of discourse analytic studies

AUTHOR(S)
Halvorsen, Kristin
PUB. DATE
December 2010
SOURCE
Journal of Applied Linguistics & Professional Practice;2010, Vol. 7 Issue 3, p273
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Modern work life is increasingly characterized by a shift from the traditional, hierarchical organization to more collaborative forms, often referred to as 'the post-bureaucratic organization'. Within this setting, team decision making is becoming a crucial activity for managing the complex and multiprofessional processes at play. The study of organizational decision making has had a long tradition in the social sciences, but largely without attending to the micro-analytic level of organizational interaction. This article provides a systematic review of discourse analytic studies on team decision making in professional settings such as healthcare, social work, education and business. The procedures used for identifying eligible studies included online database searches such as JSTOR, ISI Web of Science, ERIC, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, as well as searches in reference lists in scientific papers and books on discourse and decision making. Findings show that there are few discourse studies that explicitly deal with team decision making and that these are located empirically in different professional domains. A majority of the studies use ethnographic insights to supplement their analyses, but without analysing discourse outside the context of the meeting. The discussion will focus on discourse strategies related to assessing information, reaching agreement, managing disagreement, as well as how organizational hierarchies influence the use and effect of these strategies.
ACCESSION #
91687180

 

Related Articles

  • Stop When You're Stuck.  // TeamWork;Sep2009, Vol. 16 Issue 8, p5 

    The article discusses what to do when a management team can no longer think of any possible solution to a problem. It states that each member needs time to relax to be able to process information. It notes that discussion on a topic that is not related to the problem can also be helpful to give...

  • Brainstorm Business. Hartman, Taylor // Leadership Excellence;Feb2005, Vol. 22 Issue 2, p14 

    Examines the significance of brainstorming in helping work teams to come up with innovative ideas, products, services, and solutions. Evaluation of the personalities of employees that participates in brainstorming sessions; Ground rules in brainstorming sessions; Phases of brainstorming sessions.

  • Group Decisions: Promise and Pitfalls. Gautschi, T. F. // Design News;8/26/91, Vol. 47 Issue 16, p304 

    Discusses the advantages and disadvantages of group decision-making. Advantage of the approach in identifying factors related to the decision; Benefit in reducing implementation time; Tendency to keep the debate process objective.

  • Building an awesome team. Daum, Kevin // Smart Business Tampa Bay;Oct2010, Vol. 5 Issue 5, p5 

    The article focuses on the different methods to establish teamwork in the workplace in the U.S. Teamwork is claimed to be important in solving a problem. Amilya Antonetti, an entrepreneur, cites the importance of possessing the different types of thinkers on a team in order to attain success in...

  • A nation of entrepreneurs. Cottrill, Mike // Smart Business Tampa Bay;Oct2010, Vol. 5 Issue 5, p6 

    The article focuses on the importance of establishing an entrepreneurial environment at Ernst & Young LLP in the U.S. James Turley, the chief executive officer (CEO) of Ernst & Young, motivates his employees to act as entrepreneurs by taking the responsibility of their actions and decisions. The...

  • Creating & Building Teams.  // Creating & Building Teams - Competency Center;Apr2016, p1 

    Team building has become a more prevalent practice in organizations, as new technologies have emerged that enable companies to involve more people in projects. With the advent of these technologies, organizations are now able to tap into a broader body of knowledge and expertise than before....

  • MANAGERIAL TEAM CHARACTERISTICS EVALUATION. BURZ, R─éZVAN-DORIN // Managerial Challenges of the Contemporary Society;2013, Issue 5, p55 

    The objective of this paper is to propose a framework to evaluate the potential of a managerial team. Starting from the literature we synthesize fifteen criteria of evaluation: team cohesion, team diversity, knowledge of team members roles, trust, working environment, the degree of members...

  • Building resilient teams. Winter, Graham // Charter;Oct2012, Vol. 83 Issue 9, p37 

    The article presents the steps for strengthening the team at workplace to face the challenges that arises in the organization. It mentions the steps for developing resilient teams which include uniting the leaders of several departments in the organization to create business plan for introducing...

  • PARTICIPATIVE MULTIVARIATE DIFFERENTIATION TOWARD PURPOSEFULNESS. McKelvey, William W.; Kilmann, Ralph H. // Academy of Management Proceedings (0065-0668);1973, p489 

    The article reports on elements of organizational structure that can be altered to control costs. The authors focus on differentiation and integration within industrial organizations. It is suggested that organizations develop subsystems in an attempt to minimize costs and deal with issues of...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics