TITLE

Kill and tell

PUB. DATE
December 1991
SOURCE
U.S. News & World Report;12/23/91, Vol. 111 Issue 26, p15
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Reports that the Supreme Court last week ruled that the incarcerated can start making profitable use of their copious free time again. New York enacted the law 14 years ago to keep `Son of Sam' killer David Berkowitz from profiting from his New York murders. Mafia member Henry Hill was barred from payments owed to him from being the inspiration of the book `Wiseguy' and the movie `GoodFellas'; Forty-one states have similar laws; Bidding wars for criminal accounts.
ACCESSION #
9112232381

 

Related Articles

  • COURTSIDE. Smith, Paul M.; Fallow, Katherine A.; Mach, Daniel; Bruhl, Aaron A. // Communications Lawyer;Spring2005, Vol. 23 Issue 1, p23 

    The article presents information on several court cases. Turning away a request to rule on the viability of a federal reporter's privilege, the Supreme Court on June 27, 2005, denied certiorari in Miller v. United States, No. 04-1507, and Cooper v. United States, No. 05-1508. The...

  • TENTH CIRCUIT INTERPRETATIONS OF GARCETTI: LIMITS ON FIRST AMENDMENT PROTECTIONS FOR WHISTLE-BLOWERS.  // Denver University Law Review;2008, Vol. 85 Issue 3, p573 

    The article discusses a case that limits the First Amendment Protections. This report focuses on the landmark ruling of the United States Supreme Court in the case of Garcetti versus Ceballos. The decision restricted the free speech protections for government employees which Justice Kennedy...

  • Internet resurrects old free-speech questions. Fargo, Anthony L. // Indianapolis Business Journal;3/19/2012 Supplement, Vol. 33, p14B 

    The article reports on the decision of the Indiana Court of Appeals to opt for the right to speak anonymously online against the right to protect one's reputation.

  • Appeals Court Says Free Speech Trumps Security. Johnson, Hans P. // Academe;Jul/Aug2000, Vol. 86 Issue 4, p10 

    Reports on the April 2000 ruling of the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals in Cincinnati, Ohio on a case about the posting of computer encryption codes on the Internet by an Ohio law professor. Facts of the case; Argument for operation of codes; Protection of the United States Constitution's...

  • Court rules state can limit adult store hours.  // Inside Tucson Business;12/3/2007, Vol. 17 Issue 25, p3 

    The article focuses on a court ruling by the Arizona Court of Appeals which agreed to a state law that required adult book and video stores and movie theaters to close at one in the morning. It stressed that the law did not violate free speech rights though emphasized that the government has the...

  • Where Are We Going With Picketing? Armstrong, Barbara Nachtrieb // California Law Review;Mar1948, Vol. 36 Issue 1, p1 

    Examines the post-1940 picketing opinions of the U.S. Supreme Court as viewed against the background of the free speech constitutional principles developed its other cases. Scope of free speech guarantee; Summary of court decisions on free speech picketing cases; Approaches of the Court in...

  • Texas School-Prayer Practice Rejected By Federal Court. A. H. // Education Week;3/24/1982, Vol. 1 Issue 26, p4 

    The article reports that the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals has ruled that the prayer practice of students in Lubbock, Texas violates the First Amendment's ban on government establishment of religion. The court has rejected the school district's argument that the prayer practice were an...

  • Federal Appeals Court Upholds Superintendent's Free-Speech Right.  // Education Week;12/12/1990, Vol. 10 Issue 15, p2 

    The article reports on the ruling of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit regarding a school superintendent's right to free speech in Salado, Texas. According to the appellate court, the school board violated former Superintendent Nolan Kinsey's free-speech rights when it fired him...

  • Oregon Supreme Court Strikes Abusive Speech Statute in Case of Racist, Homophobic Road Rage. A. S. L. // Lesbian -- Gay Law Notes;Sep2008, p160 

    The article focuses on the resolution of the U.S. Court of Appeals to overrule the criminal harassment statute of Oregon in favor of the federal law on freedom of speech. The defendant was indicted of harassment based on ORS 166.065(1)(a)(B). He shouted racist and homophobic language at a...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics