… and a Nobel laureate has his fingers burnt

May 1991
New Scientist;5/4/91, Vol. 130 Issue 1767, p15
Reveals that legal fees paid to people who defended David Baltimore were some of the `indirect costs' of research which were charged to the American government. Investigation of Baltimore on charges of scientific fraud; MIT's Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research; Audit of Whitehead's bills by the Department of Health and Human Services; National Institutes of Health's conclusion regarding fabricated data in an article by Thereza Imanishi-Kari.


Related Articles

  • THE SCIENCE MOB. Hilts, Philip J. // New Republic;5/18/92, Vol. 206 Issue 20, p24 

    Discusses the case of scientist David Baltimore which is considered the one of the most remarkable cases of scientific misconduct in the U.S. Publication of a Baltimore research paper on gene expression in the periodical "Cell"; Involvement of co-author Dr. Thereza Imanishi-Kari in the...

  • US scientific fraud office found at fault. Roberts, John // BMJ: British Medical Journal (International Edition);07/16/96, Vol. 313 Issue 7048, p11 

    Reports on the findings of an American government-appointed appeals panel which found that the Office of Research Integrity was at fault over a case of scientific fraud involving American medical scientist David Baltimore. Accusation against Baltimore's junior scientist Theresa Imanishi-Kari of...

  • Science, Lies, and the Ultimate Truth. Ehrenreich, Barbara // International Journal of Periodontics & Restorative Dentistry;1992, Vol. 12 Issue 3, p172 

    The article presents the author's views on biologists David Baltimore and Thereza Imanishi-Kari's research. According to the author, Baltimore should fully apologize for his alleged cover-up of the fraud. The author further says that Imanishi-Kari succumbed to the desire to make a name for...

  • Imanishi-Kari still in limbo.  // Nature;3/3/1994, Vol. 368 Issue 6466, p1 

    Opinion. Discusses the investigation of alleged fraud by Thereza Imanishi-Kari, the Tufts University researcher who was one of the authors of a paper on immunoglobulin gene expression. Findings of guilt of data fabrication; Forged tapes from radioimmunoassay; Denial to grants from the National...

  • Busting the fraud-busters. Taubes, Gary // Discover;Jan1997, Vol. 18 Issue 1, p76 

    Looks into federal government's investigation of scientific fraud against immunologist Thereza Imanishi-Kari in the United States. Participation by Nobel laureate David Baltimore; Claim of whitewashing in the alleged misconduct; Investigative duties of the US Office of Research Integrity.

  • Where are they now? Basu, Paroma // Nature Medicine;May2006, Vol. 12 Issue 5, p492 

    The article presents various allegations of fraud directed at researchers in the U.S. In 1986, Thereza Imanishi-Kari was accused of falsifying data in a paper she had coauthored with Nobel Laureate David Baltimore. In 2004, postdoctoral students in the Massachusetts Institute of Technology...

  • Abandoned fraud case too baffling for jury. Charles, Dan // New Scientist;7/25/92, Vol. 135 Issue 1831, p4 

    Reports that prosecutors in the case against immunologist Thereza Imanishi-Kari, accused of publishing a paper in the journal `Cell' without having data to support it, have decided that it `ought to be left to scientists.' Where much of the evidence against her came from; Secret Service...

  • New evidence emerges in Tufts misconduct case. Anderson, C. // Nature;9/27/1990, Vol. 347 Issue 6291, p317 

    Reveals that investigators at the National Institutes of Health have found evidence of data fabrication and falsification in the misconduct case of Tufts University immunologist Thereza Imanishi-Kari. Grant application yields check; Secret Service called in again.

  • US drops Imanishi-Kari investigation; Baltimore withdraws Cell retraction. Anderson, Chris; Watson, Traci // Nature;7/16/1992, Vol. 358 Issue 6383, p177 

    Reveals that US prosecutors have announced that they are dropping their criminal investigation of Thereza Imanishi-Kari, a Tufts University immunologist accused of scientific misconduct because the case is too complex for a jury to reach a decision. Announcement by David Baltimore that he would...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics