TITLE

Mutual holding companies--essential for a competitive marketplace

AUTHOR(S)
Bobo, Jack
PUB. DATE
July 1998
SOURCE
National Underwriter / Life & Health Financial Services;7/27/98, Vol. 102 Issue 30, p19
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Supports the concept mutual holdings structure in life insurance market. Competitiveness of participating policies of mutual companies; Greater acceptance for full demutualization that the creation of mutual holding companies; Arguments for and against the idea of mutual holdings.
ACCESSION #
906759

 

Related Articles

  • Nine p-c groups set joint meeting in '97.  // National Underwriter / Property & Casualty Risk & Benefits Manag;3/4/96, Vol. 100 Issue 10, p25 

    Reports that property -casualty insurance group will sponsor `Insurance Leadership Forum' in New York. Date of meeting; Inclusion of sponsors.

  • Mutual holding companies: Crafting a new structure. Adkins, Jason B.; Koeppel, Jeffrey A. // Best's Review / Life-Health Insurance Edition;Feb98, Vol. 98 Issue 10, p50 

    Examines the pros and cons of insurance holding companies in the United States. Includes unfairness and risk to policyholders; Lack of limits on total sale of stocks to outside investors; Increase in valuation of stock; Access to capital markets.

  • Illinois house passes mutual holding co. bill. West, Diane // National Underwriter / Life & Health Financial Services;5/25/98, Vol. 102 Issue 21, p29 

    Reports on the US House of Congress' passage of a bill making Illinois the 19th state to allow mutual holding company conversions. Effect of the bill on property/casualty insurance company; Resistance of consumer groups to the passage of the bill.

  • Industry upset as N.Y. State's Mutual Holding Co. Bill dies. D'Allegro, Joseph // National Underwriter / Life & Health Financial Services;6/29/98, Vol. 102 Issue 26, p27 

    Reports on the death of the New York state mutual holding company (MHC) bill, to the disappointment of industry supporters. Life Insurance Council of New York's support for the bill; New York Chapter of the American Association of Retired Persons' criticism of the bill.

  • `To demutualize, or not to demutualize'. Townsend, Frederick S. // National Underwriter / Life & Health Financial Services;10/26/98, Vol. 102 Issue 43, p62 

    Advises mutual life insurers on deciding whether to demutualize or to form a mutual insurance holding company (MIHC). Distinct differences between demutualization and MIHC formation; Common objectives needed when deciding to demutualized or to form a MIHC.

  • Reskilling for Financial Organisations. McAuliffe, John; Davis, Tom // Manager: British Journal of Administrative Management;Mar/Apr2002, Issue 30, p32 

    Focuses on the impact of September 11 terrorist attack on financial community in Great Britain. Development of reskilling programs in financial organizations; Contingency plans of insurance industry; Challenges facing the financial sector.

  • Insurance bill draws fans, foes. Ellison, Evelyn // Indianapolis Business Journal;02/09/98, Vol. 18 Issue 48, p1 

    Focuses on a proposed law that would allow mutual insurers to form holding companies in Indiana. Chance to create a subsidiary that would sell stock to the public; Way for the mutual insurers to raise needed capital; Conseco Inc.'s opposition to the legislation.

  • Insurers vie to offer workers' comp coverage. Reed, Vita // Las Vegas Business Press;03/23/98, Vol. 15 Issue 12, p1 

    Reports that private insurance companies are entering Nevada's worker's compensation market. Role of regulators in market conversion; Examination of the insurers' background; Participation of Sierra Health Services Incorporated.

  • Vt., Mo. insurers study mutual holding co. option. West, Diane // National Underwriter / Life & Health Financial Services;7/22/96, Vol. 100 Issue 30, p23 

    Reports that mutual life insurers in Missouri and Vermont plan to form their own mutual holding companies under laws enacted in the states. Creation of task force to study organizational structures; Importance of legislation in maximizing advantages of a mutual holding company structure.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics