Kahn, Robert A.
April 2013
Hofstra Law Review;Spring2013, Vol. 41 Issue 3, p545
Academic Journal
The article focuses on the ban on hate speech in the European Union (EU) and discusses government regulation of hate speech in the U.S. Topics include how the EU and U.S. approach to hate speech differs through comparative law, freedom of speech protections in the U.S., and how exceptionalism impacts hate speech prosecution.


Related Articles

  • 4: MODERN DOCTRINEIN ACTION. Weinstein, James // Hate Speech, Pornography & Radical Attacks on Free Speech Doctri;1999, p51 

    Chapter 4 of the book "Hate Speech, Pornography and the Radical Attack on Free Speech Doctrine," by James Weinstein is presented. It discusses the various legislation in the U.S. concerning freedom of expression and pornography as well as the reason why it generates a negative impact among...

  • REGULATING INTIMIDATING SPEECH. Tsesis, Alexander // Harvard Journal on Legislation;Summer2004, Vol. 41 Issue 1, p389 

    In 2003, the Supreme Court decided in Virginia v. Black that laws punishing intentionally intimidating cross burning were constitutional. Professor Alexander Tsesis argues that the Thirteenth Amendment grants Congress the authority to enact necessary and proper laws that, like Virginia's statute...

  • Hate groups market to the mainstream. Marquand, Robert // Christian Science Monitor;3/6/98, Vol. 90 Issue 69, p4 

    Reports on the disturbing increase in hate groups across the world in 1998. The increasing number of organized hate groups in the United States; How hate groups are using the Internet and music to spread their message; Number of Web sites featuring racial superiority or apocalyptic religious...

  • Whose Administrative Law is it Anyway? How Global Norms Reshape the Administrative State. Barak-Erez, Daphne; Perez, Oren // Cornell International Law Journal;Fall2013, Vol. 46 Issue 3, p455 

    The emergence of global norms of administrative law reshapes the administrative state. In many areas, covering diverse topics such as trade, financial regulation, public health, and the environment, various international agencies have acquired increasing influence over domestic regulatory...

  • Labour's contemptible election trade-off. Cohen, Nick // New Statesman;1/31/2005, Vol. 134 Issue 4724/4725, p32 

    Focuses on the reduction of civil liberties for political reasons in Great Britain. Report that the government plans to introduce a bill that would make it a crime to incite religious hatred in Great Britain; Suppression of free speech by the government in order to increase the Muslim vote for...

  • Should all speech be free? Leets, Laura // Quill;May2001, Vol. 89 Issue 4, p38 

    Argues that the long-term effects of hate speech make the case for limited restrictions in the United States. Definition of moral exclusion; Provisions of the United States Communications Decency Act which deal with hate speech; Distinctions between language determining an effect and language...

  • Legal Weapons for the Weak? Democratizing the Force of Words in an Uncivil Society. Lee, Orville // Law & Social Inquiry;Fall2001, Vol. 26 Issue 4, p847 

    Considers an expansive theory of the force of words to overcome a stalemate between the First Amendment absolutists and proponents of speech regulation in the U.S. Discussion on the merits and limitations of texts which redefine hate speech as discriminatory conduct; Development of an...

  • SYMPOSIUM: COMPARATIVE LAW OF HATE SPEECH: REGULATING HATE AND RACIAL SPEECH IN ISRAEL. Cohen-Almagor, Raphael // Cardozo Journal of International & Comparative Law;Oct2009, Vol. 17 Issue 3, p405 

    The article offers information on the legislation that prohibits and regulates hate crimes in Israel. The author mentions that the influx of different races of people after the Holocaust, as well as the different cultures, traditions and ideologies, paved the way for the increase of hate...

  • Crossfire: Is the Klan's traditional symbol protected as political speech? Goldberg, Stephanie B. // ABA Journal;Sep91, Vol. 77 Issue 9, p78 

    Discusses a United States Supreme Court ruling reversing the arson conviction of a man who built a cross and burned it in front of an integrated housing complex in Minnesota to frighten black residents. Details of the case; Decision of the lower court; Summary of the reversal made by the...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics