BPB to appeal against fine

Hailstone, Laura
December 2002
Contract Journal;12/4/2002, Vol. 416 Issue 6406, p12
Trade Publication
Focuses on the plan of plasterboard manufacturer BPB to appeal against the European Commission's fine for allegedly participating in a cartel. Amount of the fine imposed on the firm; Criticisms of the firm on the imposition of the fine.


Related Articles

  • BPB STUNG AGAIN BY COMMISSION.  // PPI: Pulp & Paper International;Jan2003, Vol. 45 Issue 1, p10 

    Reports on the fine given to paper manufacturing company BPB PLC group by the European Commission in Great Britain for violations of marking fixed prices for plasterboard between 1992 and 1998, together with three construction companies. Result of the investigation conducted by the Commission;...

  • EC fines European firms.  // PPI: Pulp & Paper International;Feb2002, Vol. 44 Issue 2, p7 

    Reports the fines imposed by the European Commission's competition and mergers taskforce on companies that participated in a Europe-wide carbonless copy paper price cartel. Amount of the fines.

  • Court of justice quashes appeal from district heating 'cartel'  // European Power News;Apr2002, Vol. 27 Issue 4, p2 

    Reports the refusal of the European Commission to overturn the fines imposed on district heating companies operating a carter in Europe. Reduction of the fines by the European Court of First Instance; Reason for the reduction of fines; Effect of cartel on the domestic business of Powerpipe company.

  • Spain hits concrete cartel with €16 million in penalties.  // Construction Europe;Sep2012, Vol. 23 Issue 7, p5 

    The article reports on the 16 million euros fines imposed by the Comisió Nacional de la Competencia (CNC), the competition authority of Spain, on seven companies involved in the geotechnical tensioning and reinforced concrete industries as were charged of acting as a cartel for 14 years...

  • Cartels and Antitrust: The Role of Fines in Deterring Violations at the Margin. Smith, W. James; Vaughan, Michael B.; Formby, John P. // Southern Economic Journal;Apr87, Vol. 53 Issue 4, p985 

    Investigates the role of fines and damages in deterring antitrust violations. Interaction of fine structure and litigation strategy under profit-based damages; Interaction of fine structure and litigation strategy under damages based on monopolistic overcharge; Implication of allowing fines to...

  • Chile response to refrigeration compressor cartel.  // ACR News: Air Conditioning & Refrigeration News;Aug2012, p5 

    The article reports that Chilean courts have fined U.S. compressor manufacturer Whirlpool 10 million U.S. dollars for its alleged part in the international refrigeration compressor cartel.

  • Australian Court hits Marine Hose cartelists with €5.6 million fines. Shaw, David // European Rubber Journal;May/Jun2010, Vol. 192 Issue 3, p2 

    The article reports on the decision of the Federal Court in Melbourne, Victoria to let marine hose suppliers, including Dunlop Oil & Marine, Bridgestone Corp. and Parker ITR, allegedly involved in a cartel, pay penalties.

  • The size of cartel overcharges: Implications for U.S. and EU fining policies. Connor, John M.; Lande, Robert H. // Antitrust Bulletin;Winter2006, Vol. 51 Issue 4, p983 

    The article reports on the cartel fines and its significance to U.S. and the European Union (EU). The cartel overcharge is larger than the criminal fines of EU and the U.S. which means that U.S. and EU should increase their penalties for hard-core collusion. Monetary fines are the only...

  • European Court reduces 2006 fines for SBR cartel. Shaw, David // European Rubber Journal;Jul/Aug2011, Vol. 193 Issue 4, p14 

    The article reports that fines for the styrene butadiene rubber (SBR) cartel imposed by the European Union (EU) are reviewed by the General Court in 2011.


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics