TITLE

Court: Unions entitled to info about nonunion employees

PUB. DATE
July 2013
SOURCE
HR Specialist: California Employment Law;Jul2013, Vol. 7 Issue 7, p3
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article discusses the California Supreme Court case County of Los Angeles v. Los Angeles Employee Relations Commission which deals with employee privacy.
ACCESSION #
89360930

 

Related Articles

  • Was it a mistake to order psychiatric help for worker who was a safety risk?  // Legal Alert for Supervisors;7/12/2013, Vol. 9 Issue 196, p1 

    The article discusses the court case Kroll v. White Lake Ambulance Authority wherein the plaintiff sued the firm for invading her privacy under Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA). The plaintiff filed suit after her supervisor required her to attend counseling when her affair to a...

  • Cover employee expenses--or prepare for court.  // HR Specialist: California Employment Law;Mar2014, Vol. 8 Issue 3, p1 

    The article discusses the Court of Appeal of California, 2nd Appellate District case Vasquez v. Franklin Management which deals with the reimbursement of employees' expenses incurred while performing their jobs.

  • Take care with Interview invitations.  // People Management;Mar2015, p15 

    The article discusses a court case involving a former employee of a company who raised a race discrimination grievance against that business claiming that he was denied a promotion and then applied for another role at the same company afterwards and was unsuccessful in his interview.

  • Caste case will go ahead.  // People Management;Feb2015, p13 

    The article discusses the British court case of Tirkey v. Chandok in which a nanny of Adivasi Indian descent claimed that her employers had discriminated against her based on caste, the employers' attempt to have the case thrown out, and a judge's ruling that the Equality Act (EA) covers caste.

  • Monitoring employee activities at work: How far can you go?  // HR Weekly;10/26/2015, Vol. 3 Issue 43, p7 

    The article discusses the court case Oates v. Chattanooga Times Free Press which deals with right of privacy.

  • Fighting fire with fire: Is it wise to countersue?  // HR Specialist: Employment Law;Jun2013, Vol. 43 Issue 6, p1 

    The article focuses on the reasons as to why counterclaims or countersuit strategy is not a smart move for employers battling with employee lawsuit.

  • Was it OK to fire woman who complained about employer at public meeting?  // Legal Alert for Supervisors;7/12/2013, Vol. 9 Issue 196, p4 

    The article discusses the court case Wood v. Bethlehem Area Vocational Technical School wherein the plaintiff sued the employer after she was terminated when she complained about work condition in a public meeting.

  • REDUNDANCY SCORE MUST BE CONSIDERED.  // Accountancy;Sep2012, Vol. 149 Issue 1429, p65 

    The article comments on the case Nicholls v. Rockwell Automation Ltd. which involved the redundancy of an employee in Great Britain.

  • Legal Briefs.  // HR Specialist: Compensation & Benefits;Jan2013, Vol. 8 Issue 1, p3 

    The article discusses the U.S. court cases Clark v. Ohio Department of Job and Family Services and Thompson v. Carolina Cabinet that deals with employee benefits and labor laws.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics