TITLE

Idaho AG Takes Judge's Schools Decision to High Court

AUTHOR(S)
Williams, Rochelle
PUB. DATE
December 2002
SOURCE
Bond Buyer;12/30/2002, Vol. 342 Issue 31542, p5
SOURCE TYPE
Trade Publication
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Reports that a district court judge has exceeded the jurisdiction of the Idaho Attorney General when she ordered the state to pay for special assessments of school buildings to evaluate them for safety and that the decision has been taken to the Supreme Court. Inclusion of executive and legislative powers in the state's petition; Reason why the districts failed to demonstrate an ability to pay.
ACCESSION #
8909565

 

Related Articles

  • STICKS AND STONES: THE ABILITY OF ATTORNEYS TO APPEAL FROM JUDICIAL CRITICISM. Funk, Matthew // University of Pennsylvania Law Review;May2009, Vol. 157 Issue 5, p1485 

    In this article the author explores the circuit split regarding the ability of an attorney to appeal on her or his own behalf from a district court proceeding in which she or he is not a party in the U.S. It notes that circuits have created borders to limit the appellate jurisdiction. The author...

  • Towards Global Convenience, Fairness, and Judicial Economy: An Argument in Support of Conditional Forum Non Conveniens Dismissals Before Determining Jurisdiction in United States Federal District Courts. Hill, J. Stanton // Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law;Oct2008, Vol. 41 Issue 4, p1177 

    The Supreme Court held in Sinochem Int'l Co. Ltd. v. Malaysia Int'l Shipping Corp., that federal district courts can dismiss cases under forum non conveniens before determining jurisdiction. The facts of Sinochem did not allow the Court to determine whether a court may conditionally dismiss...

  • GEORGIA v. ASHCROFT, ATTORNEY GENERAL, et al.: appeal from the united states district court for the district of columbia.  // Supreme Court Cases: The Twenty-first Century (2000 - Present);2009, p1 

    The article presents information on the Supreme Court case Georgia v. Ashcroft, Attorney General, et al., case number 02-182, argued on April 29, 2003 and decided on June 26, 2003. Because Georgia is a covered jurisdiction under Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965, it must submit any new...

  • WELLNESS INTERNATIONAL NETWORK V. SHARIF (13-935).  // Federal Lawyer;Apr2015, Vol. 62 Issue 3, p88 

    The article discusses the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit case Texas Wellness International Network v. Sharif dealing with constitutional authority of bankruptcy courts to make a final judgment on state law claims and allowing a bankruptcy court to resolve claims otherwise outside its...

  • SUSPECTING THE STATES: SUPREME COURT REVIEW OF STATE-COURT STATE-LAW JUDGEMENTS. Fitzgerald, Laura S. // Michigan Law Review;Oct2002, Vol. 101 Issue 1, p80 

    Presents an alternative rule on the appellate jurisdiction of the U.S. Supreme Court in reversing state-court state-law judgments. Discussion on the proven mistrust proposal; Analysis of key cases which demonstrate ambiguous and contradictory justifications of the Supreme Court for its practice...

  • Epitaph for Mandatory Jurisdiction. Stern, Robert L.; Gressman, Eugene; Shapiro, Stephen M. // ABA Journal;Dec88, Vol. 74 Issue 12, p66 

    Reports on the history of the U.S. Supreme Court's mandatory jurisdiction. Creation of the circuit courts of appeals in 1891; Discretionary review authority granted to the court over certain appellate decisions; Categories of mandatory appeals; Legislation that freed the court from mandatory...

  • Tilton v. Finch. WHELAN, CHARLES M. // America;9/27/1969, Vol. 121 Issue 9, p222 

    The article reports that on December 1, 1969, the Tilton versus Finch case will go to trial in the U.S. District Court for the District of Connecticut. It notes that the case will be decided by a three-judge court since a substantial constitutional question is involved. It states that appeal...

  • Supreme Court Orders District Court to Reconsider Campaign "Reform" Case. Andrusko, Dave // National Right to Life News;Feb2006, Vol. 33 Issue 2, p5 

    Focuses on the decision of the U.S. Supreme Court to order a federal district court in 2006 to reconsider its ruling towards the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002. Information on the act; Rationale behind the Supreme Court decision; Effect of the act on society.

  • In the wake of the Supreme Court decision on Maine's drug program, states look for direction.  // State Health Watch;Jul2003, Vol. 10 Issue 7, p1 

    Focuses on the impact of the U.S. Supreme Court decision on Maine's drug program for the effort of U.S. states to control pharmacy costs and make cost-effective drugs available to U.S. citizens. Background on the Maine Rx Program; Information on a case filed by Pharmaceutical Research and...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sign out of this library

Other Topics