TITLE

Comparing Alternative Investment Strategies Using Risk-Adjusted Performance Measures

AUTHOR(S)
Leggio, Karyl B.; Lien, Donald
PUB. DATE
January 2003
SOURCE
Journal of Financial Planning;Jan2003, Vol. 16 Issue 1, p82
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
This article compares alternative investment strategies using risk-adjusted performance measures. Investment advisors are asked to recommend an investing strategy that increases returns while reducing the investor's exposure to risk. It was found that Sharpe ratio typically gives conflicting ranking results when compared with the upside potential ration (UPR). Investors are concerned with risk exposure. But the standard deviation of returns captures both positive and negative variation from the mean. Investors enjoy returns that vary from the mean when the variation is positive. The real sources of risk for investors are the variations from the mean that are negative. These behavioral findings call into question the validity of results found using the Sharpe ratio as the barometer of performance. The Sortino ratio begins to capture investor's concern with risk by replacing the standard deviation of returns with the downside risk as a measure of risk. The Sortino ratio, however, continues to use excess returns as the measure of returns. The UPR goes one step further by focusing the attention of the return measure on positive excess returns only. Traditional analysis uses the Sharpe ratio to evaluate the success of investing strategies. Dollar-cost averaging is not superior using the Sharpe ratio. More important, performance metrics that more accurately reflect investor risk and return such as the Sortino ratio and the UPR also fail to consistently support DCA as preferred investing strategy. DCA is typically a less volatile investing strategy; for a certain class of investors, it may be a preferred asset allocation technique. But research does not support the uniform recommendation of DCA as a preferred strategy. Investment advisors are urged to consider investor risk preferences before recommending an asset allocation strategy.
ACCESSION #
8841400

 

Related Articles

  • Avoid the 'herd' mentality. Lynott, William J. // Dermatology Times;Dec2008, Vol. 29 Issue 12, p80 

    The article discusses the strategies for profitable personal investment as favored by many of financial advisers. It includes dollar-cost averaging technique which calls for establishing a fixed dollar amount to invest at regular intervals, and the buy-and-hold philosophy which calls for buying...

  • Set Investors Straight. Moisand, Dan // Financial Planning;Feb2010, Vol. 40 Issue 2, p73 

    The article examines the concepts of personal finance, dollar cost averaging (DCA), tax-loss harvesting, and Roth conversions. It cites that DCA may lower the risk of getting into an investment at a high price. It argues tht the longer clients rely on DCA, the greater the probability that the...

  • HOW TO BUILD AN ALL-ETF PORTFOLIO. Polyak, Ilana // Financial Planning;Sep2007, Vol. 37 Issue 9, Special section p6 

    The article offers advice on how to build an all exchange traded fund (ETF) portfolio. Global Trends president Tom Lydon notes that his strategy involves buying or selling a slice of a sector when it moves above or below its 200-day moving average. It urges advisors to buy and hold investors so...

  • Dynamic Dollar-Cost Averaging. Richardson, Gary M.; Bagamery, Bruce D. // Journal of Financial Service Professionals;Mar2011, Vol. 65 Issue 2, p56 

    Research suggests that lump-sum investing outperforms dollar-cost averaging. Although this may be correct, not every investor has a lump sum available to invest. For investors who must invest periodically because of their personal financial situations, some form of dollar-cost averaging may be...

  • Lump Sums Take Their Lumps. Israelsen, Craig L. // Financial Planning;Jan1999, Vol. 29 Issue 1, p51 

    Contends that lump-sum investing does not always yield superior returns over dollar-cost averaging. Discussion on common the notion that lump-sum investing yields to higher returns than dollar-cost averaging; Illustration to prove that the notion is not true.

  • Dollar-Cost Averaging: The Trade-Off Between Risk and Return. Cho, David D.; Kuvvet, Emre // Journal of Financial Planning;Oct2015, Vol. 28 Issue 10, p52 

    The article discusses the method of dollar-cost averaging (DCA) used in investing, as well as the trade-off between risk and return on investment. It describes investment portfolios in terms of standard deviation and expected return using a mean-variance analysis and compares the suitability of...

  • What Clients Should Know About Dollar-Cost Averaging: Retirement Scan.  // Financial-planning.com;10/13/2015, p1 

    This strategy allows clients to buy more shares over time, but it also can reinforce jitters if they're nervous about market declines; Plus, how clients can avoid Medicare Part-B increases next year.

  • Determinants of Financial Success. Jahnke, William // Journal of Financial Planning;Jun98, Vol. 11 Issue 3, p34 

    This article argues that the question of what determines financial success can be addressed in the context of what determines the financial success ratio (FSR) of a client. The investment return assumptions are critical in projecting the FSR of a client. The advisor needs to project the returns...

  • DANGER SIGNS. PALESTRANT, VITA // Money (Australia Edition);Aug2015, Issue 181, p62 

    The article discusses the importance of assessing the performance of a superannuation fund. Topics mentioned include an overview of warning signs of an underperforming super fund such as poor returns, oversight structure, and downside protection, advice on financial planning specialist Max...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics