TITLE

Key role players in takeovers

AUTHOR(S)
Brown, Simon
PUB. DATE
April 2013
SOURCE
Finweek;4/25/2013, p34
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article presents the author's insights on mergers and acquisitions of companies. The author highlights the significance of several regulatory role players in the mergers and acquisitions including the Competition Commission, and the Takeover Regulation Panel which ensures the fair treatment between shareholders and bidding company. Moreover, the author relates the Bidvest/Adcock and Protech/Eqstra deals on corporate takeovers.
ACCESSION #
88352780

 

Related Articles

  • Kahnawake Gaming Commission signs MOU with Antigua. Standup, Jordan // Eastern Door;6/25/2010, Vol. 19 Issue 24, p4 

    The article reports on another memorandum of understanding (MOU) that the Kahnawake Gaming Commission in Quebec and the Financial Services Regulatory Commission for Antigua and Barbuda signed on June 17, 2010 to further strengthen the agreement that they established in 2005.

  • Efficiency gains mean quick decisions.  // Finance Week;10/26/2001, p36 

    Focuses on the enhanced efficiency of the mergers and acquisitions (M&A) division of the Competition Commission in South Africa. Improvement of the decision making capability of the group; Transactions turned down by the commission; Creativity reflected in the recommendations of the M&A division.

  • Returns from the Merger Boom.  // Mergers & Acquisitions: The Dealermaker's Journal;2004 Supp Honing your Acquistion, p28 

    Presents a study that examined total shareholder return to the acquirer at the announcement of the acquisition deal and one year later. Average premium paid for targets across the entire sample; Comparison of the performance of cash deals and stock deals; Role of mergers in creating value at...

  • Hostile Bidders, Long-Term Performance, and Restructuring Methods: Evidence from the UK. Raj, Mahendra; Forsyth, Michael // American Business Review;Jan2002, Vol. 20 Issue 1, p71 

    Examines the pre- and post-long-term performance of hostile bidders in Great Britain. Announcement of a hostile takeover bid; Redeployment of assets after takeover; Structural changes within a firm.

  • Determinants of Bidder Competition in Corporate Takeovers. Noronha, Gregory M.; Sen, Nilanjan; Smith, David M. // Journal of Economics & Finance;Fall96, Vol. 20 Issue 3, p39 

    The importance of bidder competition in the corporate takeover process has long been recognized in theoretical models. This paper provides empirical tests of those models. The results indicate that resistance by target management to an initial bid encourages multiple bidders. Competing bidders...

  • Competitive Bidding Adds Complexity, Lawyers to Deals. Yu, Jane // Orange County Business Journal;1/23/2012, Vol. 35 Issue 4, p35 

    The article offers views concerning the potential of competitive topping bids to generate more business for mergers and acquisition lawyers in California.

  • Citicorp, CGW Southeast outbid Guardian for Cameron Ashley. Green, Leslie // Crain's Detroit Business;04/03/2000, Vol. 16 Issue 14, p2 

    Reports the outbidding of Guardian Industries Corp. by CGW Southeast Partners IV LP and an affiliate of Citigroup's Citicorp Venture Capital Ltd. for the acquisition of Cameron Ashley Building Products Inc. in the United States.

  • Proxy Hits on A&P's $1.3 Billion Buy Of Rival Supermarket Chain Pathmark. J. R. C. // Mergers & Acquisitions Report;10/15/2007, Vol. 20 Issue 39, p12 

    The article reports that the stockholders' meeting on the takeout of Pathmark Stores Inc. by The Greater Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. (A&P) reached to a bidding of $1.3 billion. It is inferred that the A&P board of directors can elect to terminate the merger agreement based on its good faith...

  • UNREGULABLE DEFENSES AND THE PERILS OF SHAREHOLDER CHOICE. Arlen, Jennifer; Talley, Eric // University of Pennsylvania Law Review;Dec2003, Vol. 152 Issue 2, p577 

    Shows that even when shareholders can effectively assess and react to hostile bids, shareholder choice may not be the optimal legal choice. Advantages of managerial control of publicly held firms; Taxonomy of defensive measures; Case for shareholder control over tender offers; Change of control...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics