States' Rights Are for Liberals

Bazelon, Emily
July 2013
Atlantic;Jul/Aug2013, Vol. 312 Issue 1, p102
The article discusses federalism in the U.S. and its appeal, according to the author, to liberals, focusing on how states' rights can promote several liberal political agendas such as gay marriage and marijuana legalization, with comments about Yale Law School professors' promotion of federalism.


Related Articles

  • National Geographies: Toward a "Federalism Function" of American Tort Law. TEJANI, RIAZ // San Diego Law Review;Winter2014, Vol. 51 Issue 1, p81 

    The article discusses federalization of tort law in the U.S. Topics discussed include the term federalism function defined as the capacity for torts disputes to implicate the balance of federal and state authority, debates on federal preemption and state sovereignty, and issues regarding...

  • The Fallacies of States’ Rights, by Sotirios A. Barber. Dinan, John // Publius: The Journal of Federalism;Apr2013, Vol. 43 Issue 2, pe4 

    The article reviews the book "The Fallacies of States' Rights," by Sotirios A. Barber.

  • The Fallacies of States' Rights.  // Journal of American History;Mar2014, Vol. 100 Issue 4, p1179 

    No abstract available.

  • Rick Perry's Tenth Commandment. Williamson, Kevin D. // National Review;4/4/2011, Vol. 63 Issue 6, p28 

    The article focuses on the political beliefs of Texas governor Rick Perry. It states that he is a strong believer of states' sovereignty and American federalism. It mentions that he is an outspoken opponent of former president George W. Bush and claims that Bush never was a fiscal conservative....

  • WHEN CAN A STATE SUE THE UNITED STATES? Grove, Tara Leigh // Cornell Law Review;2016, Vol. 101 Issue 4, p851 

    The article examines states in the U.S. suing the federal government. Particular focus is given to instances of states vs. the United States, including those involving Massachusetts, Texas and Oregon. Additional topics discussed include the Federalism scholar Ernest Young, constitutional...

  • Restricted Authority: Slavery Politics, Internal Improvements, and the Limitation of National Administrative Capacity. Mulcare, Daniel M. // Political Research Quarterly;Dec2008, Vol. 61 Issue 4, p671 

    This article connects slavery politics with the curtailment of antebellum infrastructure policy and the limits placed on the development of the early American state. Because many Southerners feared that a unified Northern majority could hinder slavery's expansion or continued existence, they...

  • GAME OVER?: THE POTENTIAL DEMISE OF THE PROFESSIONAL AND AMATEUR SPORTS PROTECTION ACT. Ranjo, Jason J. // Rutgers Law Journal;Fall2010, Vol. 42 Issue 1, p213 

    The article focuses on the U.S. Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act of 1992 (PASPA), which limits U.S. states' authority to legalize sports betting and gambling. Topics include the constitutionality of PASPA, the exceptions to PASPA regulations, and its application to casinos and...

  • Rhetoric of Fear. PRIBANIC-SMITH, ERIKA J. // Journalism History;Fall2012, Vol. 38 Issue 3, p166 

    South Carolinians declared protective tariffs Congress passed in 1824 and 1828 unconstitutional and unfair for placing undue burden on the South while benefiting the North. A political faction formed that saw the rights of the state as paramount and sought to protect them, to the point of...

  • Reverse Preemption. Carlson, Ann E.; Mayer, Andrew // Ecology Law Quarterly;2013, Vol. 40 Issue 3, p583 

    Common accounts of federalism and preemption do not envision states as supreme. According to the conventional view, states may share regulatory space with the federal government, carry out federal programs, or operate independently and even exclusively. But in two provisions in federal law,...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics