TITLE

In Defense of Citizens United

AUTHOR(S)
Hubbard, Glenn; Kane, Tim
PUB. DATE
July 2013
SOURCE
Foreign Affairs;Jul/Aug2013, Vol. 92 Issue 4, p126
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article looks at politics and government in the U.S. as of 2013, focusing on campaign finance. The authors present a case for the view that restrictions on political campaign fundraising, beginning with the 1971 U.S. Federal Election Campaign Act (FECA), are responsible for the polarization between Democrats and Republicans in the U.S. Congress, the decline of bipartisanship, and the resulting political stalemates in areas including U.S. fiscal policy. They say campaign finance laws have created an artificial monopoly, benefiting the Democratic and Republican parties but preventing the emergence of less-partisan ideas and candidates. They discuss the 2010 U.S. Supreme Court decision in the Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission case.
ACCESSION #
88213872

 

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics