TITLE

THE SYSTEM ISN'T BROKEN, IT'S FIXED: ENDING BIG MONEY AND CORPORATIONS IN OUR ELECTIONS

AUTHOR(S)
Coleridge, Greg
PUB. DATE
March 2013
SOURCE
University of Toledo Law Review;Spring2013, Vol. 44 Issue 3, p541
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
In this article the author discusses political influence of large corporations especially in elections campaigns and reflects on the corrupt political process in the U.S. It highlights the need for constitutional amendment regarding constitutional rights and regulation of political spending and contributions. It reflects on the U.S. Supreme Court decision in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission that the government cannot restrict independent political expenditures by corporations.
ACCESSION #
88172518

 

Related Articles

  • CITIZENS UNITED V. FEC: THE CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT THAT BIG CORPORATIONS SHOULD HAVE BUT DO NOT WANT. Epstein, Richard A. // Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy;Spring2011, Vol. 34 Issue 2, p639 

    The article examines the justifications of the Supreme Court decision in the Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission (FEC) court case concerning the issue of corporate speech in the political arena. The court ruled in favor of Citizens United, a decision criticized by many for it gives...

  • CITIZENS UNITED AGAINST CITIZENS UNITED: A MOVEMENT IS BUILDING TO AMEND THE CONSTITUTION. Ott, Riki // Earth Island Journal;Autumn2012, Vol. 27 Issue 3, p40 

    The article focuses on the decision given by the U.S. Supreme Court in a court case Citizens United v. Federal Elections Commission. The court ruled that corporations as persons have a First Amendment right to use unlimited amounts of money, as speech, on advertisement campaigns as long as those...

  • The History, the Verdict and Now. Gaffney, Mason // CounterPunch;3/1/2010, Vol. 17 Issue 5, p1 

    The article presents the author's insights on the decision of the U.S. Supreme Court on the case Citizens United vs. Federal Elections Commission. He cites economic milestones that involve revolutions, Supreme Court jurisdictions and federal decisions on payroll tax, corporate income tax and...

  • OPENING THE FLOODGATES?: CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AND CORPORATE POLITICAL ACTIVITY AFTER CITIZENS UNITED. Persinger, John // Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics & Public Policy;2012, Vol. 26 Issue 1, p327 

    The article focuses on the impact of the U.S. Supreme Court case judgment in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission (FEC) on corporate governance and corporate political activity. Topics include the U.S. Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971, the increase in political campaign donations...

  • CITIZENS UNITED, TAX POLICY, AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE. Behrens, Michael A. // Florida Tax Review;2012, Vol. 12 Issue 7, p589 

    The article presents information on the U.S. Supreme Court case Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission which created several controversies related to corporate tax policies. The tax motivated and corporate campaign interventions and the issues involving corporate stakeholders are...

  • Citizens United: Latest Campaign Finance Decision Creates More Gray Areas. Getman, Elizabeth // Administrative & Regulatory Law News;Spring2010, Vol. 35 Issue 3, p13 

    The article looks at the consequences of the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission which permitted corporations to make unlimited advocacy expenditures in election campaigns. It cites the arguments presented by the defendant on issues like electioneering...

  • Making value-smart purchases. Radar, Eric // Between the Lines (10807551);9/2/2010, Issue 1835, p13 

    The article focuses on the decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in the Citizens United case that businesses have the right to spend any amount on political campaigns. This ruling was criticized by many public interest groups and other institutions which acknowledge its potential negative impact on...

  • LET THE PEOPLE SPEAK: THE CASE FOR A CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT TO REMOVE CORPORATE SPEECH FROM THE AMBIT OF THE FIRST AMENDMENT. Weissman, Robert // Temple Law Review;Summer2011, Vol. 83 Issue 4, p979 

    The article focuses on the U.S. Supreme Court decision Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission (FEC) which dealt with campaign finance. Information is provided on how the decision gave corporations First Amendment protections and allowed corporations to make unlimited amounts of donations...

  • FOREIGN NATIONALS, ELECTORAL SPENDING, AND THE FIRST AMENDMENT. MASSARO, TONI M. // Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy;Spring2011, Vol. 34 Issue 2, p663 

    The article analyzes whether foreign speakers or corporations can be restricted from making political campaign contributions despite the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in the Citizens United v. Federal Elections Committee (FEC) case. The Court ruled that the First Amendment rights of corporations...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics