TITLE

Other Recent Decisions

PUB. DATE
June 2013
SOURCE
Benefits Magazine;Jun2013, Vol. 50 Issue 6, p68
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article discusses several court cases related to employee benefits. In McCormack v. Joint Industry Board of the Electrical Industry et al., the court rules against the plaintiff's claim that the availability requirement is ambiguous. In Ruppert v. Principal Life Insurance Co., the court did not agree with the plaintiff's motion for class certification against the defendant accused of violating the Employee Retirement Income Security Act.
ACCESSION #
88035990

 

Related Articles

  • Benefits questions can trigger ERISA suit.  // HR Specialist: Illinois Employment Law;Nov2012, Vol. 6 Issue 11, p1 

    The article discusses the case George v. Junior Achievement from the U.S. 7th Circuit Court of Appeals which deals with the benefits of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA).

  • Plaintiffs' ERISA Claims Denied.  // Benefits Magazine;Apr2013, Vol. 50 Issue 4, p61 

    The article discusses a court case where the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit dismissed plaintiffs' Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) claims after failing to properly raise and appeal such claims. The district court granted the defendants' motion to dismiss after...

  • An in-depth look at Montanile v. Board of Trustees. Ross, Nancy; Netter, Brian; Bartine, Abigail // Ebn.benefitsnews.com;11/12/2015, p5 

    The article discusses the U.S. Supreme Court case Montanile v. Board of Trustees of the National Elevator Industry Health Benefit Plan which deals with the reimbursement to an employee under the Employee Retirement and Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA).

  • Benefits Interference Claims Against Allstate Move Forward. Moore, Rebecca // Plan Advisor News;7/8/2016, p1 

    The article reports on the decision of the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania to move forward Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) Section 510 interference of benefits claims against Allstate Insurance Co.

  • Benefit Denial Was Arbitrary and Capricious.  // Benefits Magazine;Mar2016, Vol. 53 Issue 3, p55 

    The article discusses a court case which deals with a suit regarding the denial of pension benefits to a plaintiff direct owner, requiring the administrator's plan to recalculate the employee's proper benefits. The district court for the Middle District of Florida re-examines the case...

  • Termination Did Not Breach ERISA Fiduciary Duty.  // HR Magazine;Dec2013, Vol. 58 Issue 12, p57 

    The article discusses a court case which focuses on the breach of the U.S. Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) fiduciary duty. A complaint was filed by James Brooks, employee of Prairie Packaging Inc., against the company after his employment was terminated and insurance coverage was...

  • With No Presumption of Prudence, RadioShack Faces New Lawsuit. Moore, Rebecca // Plan Advisor News;2014, p103 

    The article reports on the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) lawsuit filed on behalf of participants of the RadioShack 401(k) Plan and the RadioShack Puerto Rico 1165(e) Plan of electronics retailer company RadioShack Corp. Topics discussed include the alleged failure of the...

  • Hospital Cannot Seek Simultaneous Recourse Under Separate ERISA Provisions.  // Benefits Magazine;Mar2016, Vol. 53 Issue 3, p50 

    The article discusses the U.S. court case Koenig et al. v. Aetna Life Insurance Company et al., which deals with employees seeking simultaneous recourse under separate employer-sponsored welfare plans under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA). The district court outlines the...

  • STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS MUST BE REASONABLE.  // Benefits Quarterly;2014 Third Quarter, Vol. 30 Issue 3, p43 

    The article discusses the court case Heimeshoff v. Hartford Life Accident Insurance Co. wherein the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that a participant in an employee benefit plan covered by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 may contractually agree to a particular limitation period....

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics