Canada Responds to COOL Rule

May 2013
National Hog Farmer Expert Blog;5/24/2013, p2
Blog Entry
The article reports that the Canadian Pork Council views the U.S. country-of-origin labeling (COOL) regulations as discriminating against Canadian feeder pigs and slaughter hogs, saying that the regulation removes flexibility to commingle Canadian and U.S. live swine at processing plants.


Related Articles

  • Meat the presses. Jacobson, Michael F. // Nutrition Action Health Letter;Jun94, Vol. 21 Issue 5, p3 

    Reports on the proposal by the ground beef industry to the U.S. Department of Agriculture to define lean mean. Feature of the proposal; Reason for the use of `lean'; Facts people don't know.

  • Dateline Washington.  // Consumers' Research Magazine;Dec93, Vol. 76 Issue 12, p6 

    States that the Clinton administration announced that it would release new regulations for safe-handling labels for poultry and meat products. What the new regulations are intended for.

  • COOL's cost to Canada's pork industry nearly $2 billion.  // Canadian Meat Business;Jan/Feb2013, Vol. 12 Issue 1, p26 

    The article reports on the mandatory country of origin labelling (COOL) in the U.S. which has cost Canadian pork producers U.S. $1.9 million in direct damages, according to the Canadian Pork Council.

  • Truth in meat labeling?  // Joe Weider's Muscle & Fitness;Jan92, Vol. 53 Issue 1, p28 

    Reports that ground beef labeled `lean' or `extra lean' may contain up to 22% fat by weight. Item in the `University of California Berkeley Wellness Letter'; Federal requirements on meat labeling.

  • EU macht Tempo bei Herkunftslabel. Krost, Heidrun // Lebensmittel Zeitung;4/26/2013, Issue 17, p22 

    The article discusses a proposal of the European Union for the labeling of meat products in order to determine its origin.

  • Geburtsort soll auf Fleischverpackung.  // Lebensmittel Zeitung;1/31/2014, Issue 5, p28 

    The article presents information on the European government policy on the labeling of meat and meat products with special attention to the determination of the meat's origin.

  • British lawmaker calls for labeling of non-stunned animal's meat.  // Jewish Telegraphic Agency: 1922 to present;11/4/2014, p1 

    (JTA) -- Meat sold in Britain should be labeled if the animal has not been stunned before slaughter, a British lawmaker said.

  • Organic obstacles. Robinson, Rachel // National Provisioner;Jul99, Vol. 213 Issue 7, p48 

    Examines how the United States Department of Agriculture's January 14, 1999 decision to allow `organic' labels on meat and poultry products has affected the industry. Reaction of the nation's organic producers to the decision; Number of organic product labels submitted for approval since the...

  • MEATS GET NUTRITION LABELS: USDA.  // SN: Supermarket News;1/3/2011, Vol. 59 Issue 1, p6 

    The article reports Food Safety and Inspection Service of the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) has said that businesses related to meat and poultry products will have to display nutrition facts panels on their package labels.


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics