Court decision further erodes workers' rights

June 2013
NYSUT United;Jun2013, Vol. 3 Issue 10, p16
The article presents a reprint of the article "Court decision further erodes worker's rights," by Moshe Z. Marvit. It cites a D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals decision which is seen to weaken the authority of the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB). It says that the court had ruled that the NLRB cannot mandate staff of their labor rights. It states that the D.C. Circuit board ruling looked at the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) Sections 6 and 8(c) and analyzed First Amendment rules.


Related Articles

  • GOLAN V. HOLDER.  // Berkeley Technology Law Journal;2011 Annual Review, Vol. 26 Issue 1, p580 

    The article discusses a court case concerning Golan v. Holder. The U.S. Tenth Circuit has remanded the case filed by the plaintiffs, such as motion picture distributors and orchestra conductors, against the government which challenges the constitutionality of Section 514 of Uruguay Round...

  • Hospital's RNs Not Considered 'Supervisors' Peikes, Lawrence // HR Magazine;Apr2005, Vol. 50 Issue 4, p117 

    Provides information on a case held by the U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals concerning the eligibility of registered nurses at Hospital General Menonita to vote for union representation, on December 23, 2004. Facts of the case; Petition filed by the hospital's union with the U.S. National Labor...

  • Stock Grant to Employees Did Not Violate NLRA. Coleman III, John J. // HR Magazine;Jan2009, Vol. 54 Issue 1, p79 

    The article discusses the court case, Unite Here v. the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) of the U.S. over stock options granted to an employees. The 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals enforced a NLRB decision rejecting Section 8(a) National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) charges against an...

  • Court rules worker's suit not 'advertising' injury. Stiegler, Mayo H. // Business Insurance;7/14/2003, Vol. 37 Issue 28, p10 

    Presents news briefs related to developments in the business insurance industry of the U.S. as of July 14, 2003. Judgment passed by the sixth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in a worker's suit against his former employer for tortious interference with economic advantage; Decision taken by an...

  • Plaintiffs Entitled to Trial on Discrimination Claims Based on Employer's English-Only Policy.  // Venulex Legal Summaries;2006 Q1, p1 

    The article discusses the decision of the Tenth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in the case Maldonado versus City of Altus. The Court has held that several Hispanic plaintiffs should be permitted to go to trial on their claims that their employer's English-only policy violates federal...

  • Court Vacates Ruling in Oklahoma City Desegregation Suit. Snider, William // Education Week;9/27/1989, Vol. 9 Issue 4, p5 

    The article reports that the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit had withdrawn its ruling on the desegregation suit filed before them in Oklahoma City. The said desegregation suit, as believed by the civil-rights experts, might become a basis on how and when school-desegregation cases...

  • YOU BE THE JUDGE. Donaldson, William // Saturday Evening Post;4/12/1952, Vol. 224 Issue 41, p111 

    The article focuses on the 1935 decision of the U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals on a lawsuit involving a lumber company and the insurance firm. According to the court, the insurance firm did not have to pay. The policy was intended to cover only direct fire damage to the insured property, and did...

  • Appeals Court Ruling Leaves Wineries Whining. Mack, Debbi // Corporate Legal Times;Jul2003, Vol. 13 Issue 140, p66 

    Reports on the ruling of the 4th Circuit Appeals Court prohibiting North Carolina wineries from selling directly to consumers in the state. Argument of the plaintiffs; Implications of the ruling; Observations of the Appeals Court.

  • Court Hands Victory To Game Makers. Miller, Julie // Corporate Legal Times;Nov2005, Vol. 15 Issue 168, p75 

    The article reports on the decision of the 8th Circuit Court of Appeals in favor of video game maker's intellectual property in Saint Louis, Missouri. The court ruled that hobbyists who tinkered with their favorite games to modify them infringed that video game maker's intellectual property. In...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics